Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 14, ISSUE 1, SUPPLEMENT 2, S1-S90, April 2023

Download started.

Ok

The 2022 National Nursing Workforce Survey

      Background: Every two years, the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) and the National Forum of State Nursing Workforce Centers (Forum) conduct the only national-level survey focused on the entire U.S. nursing workforce. The survey generates data on the supply of registered nurses (RNs) and licensed practical nurses/licensed vocational nurses (LPNs/LVNs). These data are especially crucial in providing information on emerging nursing issues, which in 2022, was the impact of the (COVID-19) pandemic on the nursing workforce. Purpose: To provide data critical to planning for enough adequately prepared nurses and ensuring a safe, diverse, and effective healthcare system. Methods: This study used a mixed-mode approach, involving mailing a national, randomized sample survey to licensed RNs and LPNs/LVNs in most jurisdictions, supplemented by a national, randomized sample survey emailed to licensed RNs and LPNs/LVNs in four jurisdictions and data from the e-Notify nurse licensure notification system for five jurisdictions. Data from RN and LPN/LVN respondents were collected between April 11, 2022, and September 30, 2022. Data included nurse demographics, educational attainment, employment, practice characteristics, and trends. Results: The total number of active RN and LPN/LVN licenses in the United States were 5,239,499 and 973,788, respectively. The median age of RNs was 46 years and 47years for LPNs/LVNs, which reflects a decrease of 6 years for each cohort from the 2020 data. This decline was associated with estimated losses to the workforce of at least 200,000 experienced RNs and 60,000 experienced LPNs/LVNs. An average of 89% of all nurses who maintain licensure are employed in nursing with roughly 70% working full-time. Hospitals and nursing/extended care facilities continue to be the primary practice setting for RNs and LPNs, respectively. Increased proportions of male and Hispanic/Latino nurses have introduced greater racial diversity in the nursing workforce. The nursing workforce is becoming increasingly more educated with more than 70% of RNs holding a baccalaureate degree or higher. More than one-quarter of all nurses report that they plan to leave nursing or retire over the next 5 years. Increased demand from the COVID-19 pandemic and inflation led nursing incomes to rise significantly across the country. Nurses were also specifically asked how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them, and more than 60% of all nurses reported an increase in their workload because of the pandemic. Conclusion: In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the nursing workforce has undergone a dramatic shift with the loss of hundreds of thousands of experienced RNs and LPNs/LVNs. The nursing workforce has become younger and more diverse with increases reflected for Hispanic/Latino and male nurses. An increasing proportion of the RN workforce holds a baccalaureate degree or higher, moving closer to goals established by the National Academy of Medicine. Salaries have notably increased for nurses, likely due to inflation and increased demand for nursing services. With a quarter of the population contemplating leaving the profession, the impact of the pandemic may still be felt in the future.

      Keywords

      The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) has collaborated with the National Forum of State Nursing Workforce Centers (Forum) to conduct the National Nursing Workforce Survey since 2013. The 2022 survey added questions pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic and travel nursing. Data are comparable to the 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2020 datasets, which facilitated trend analyses. This study is the only continuous national, randomized survey of this size specifically focused on nurses, and it is the only comprehensive and updated study that includes registered nurses (RNs) as well as licensed practical nurses/licensed vocational nurses (LPNs/LVNs). The evidence generated from the National Nursing Workforce Survey fills a critical gap in supply-side information about nurses in the United States.

      Demographics

      In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the nursing workforce has undergone a dramatic shift, with many older nurses opting to leave the profession. In 2020, nurses aged 55 years or older accounted for 43% of the RN workforce and 42% of the LPN/LVN workforce. In 2022, this same age cohort accounted for 31% of RNs and 30% of LPNs/LVNs. This decline was associated with estimated losses to the workforce of at least 200,000 experienced RNs and 60,000 experienced LPNs/LVNs.
      The losses in the experienced workforce have been somewhat offset by gains in the lowest age ranges. In 2020, nurses aged 29 years or younger accounted for 8% of the RN workforce and 7% of the LPN/LVN workforce. In 2022, this same age cohort accounted for 11% of RNs and 10% of LPNs/LVNs. This increase was associated with estimated gains to the workforce of 130,000 RNs and 16,000 LPNs/LVNs.
      The workforce in 2022 is more demographically diverse and representative of the country’s population than in any year in which this study was previously conducted. Women continue to account for a large majority of nurses; however, the proportion of men licensed as RNs or LPNs/LVNs in the country has increased steadily since at least 2015. Currently, men account for 11% of the RN workforce, an increase from 8% in 2015. Though less pronounced, the same pattern holds true for the proportion of men in the LPN/LVN workforce.
      RNs are more likely to report identifying as an underrepresented racial minority. Overall, the RN workforce is 80% White/Caucasian, a slight decrease from 81% in 2020. In contrast, 72% of the U.S. population identifies as White/Caucasian (
      • Census Bureau U.S.
      ). RNs who reported being of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity comprised 7% of the workforce in 2022, whereas in 2015 they represented 4% of the workforce. It is unclear whether this increase in diversity will continue. After years of decline, the proportion of RNs identifying as White/Caucasian in the youngest age ranges has risen back to the level of the overall population mean.
      LPNs/LVNs are also more likely to report identifying as an underrepresented racial minority. Overall, the LPN/LVN workforce is 66% White/Caucasian, a decrease from 70% in 2020. LPNs/LVNs who reported being of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity comprised 12% of the workforce in 2022, an increase from 6% in 2015. As with the RN workforce, the proportion of LPNs/LVNs identifying as White/Caucasian in the youngest age ranges has risen back to the level of the overall population mean.

      Employment

      Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, nursing employment has jumped significantly. Reporting data suggest an estimated 89% of RNs who maintain licensure are employed in nursing; among these nurses, 70% work full time, 11% work part time, and about 8% work per diem shifts. This is an increase from the 84% who reported working in nursing in 2020. Likewise, the 88% of LPNs/LVNs who reported being employed in nursing in 2022 was an increase over the 82% of LPNs/LVNs who did so in 2020.
      Despite these gains, the COVID-19 pandemic may still have an impact on future employment. Survey data indicate that 28% of all nurse respondents plan to retire in the next 5 years, an increase from the 21% who responded positively in 2020.
      Hospitals continue to be the primary practice setting for RNs, followed by the ambulatory care setting, home health, and nursing homes. The primary practice setting for LPNs/LVNs is nursing homes/ extended care settings followed by hospitals and nursing homes. In comparison to 2020, increased proportions of RNs and LPNs/LVNs reported providing direct patient care in their jobs.

      Education

      In the 2022 survey, the educational accomplishment of RNs increased with more than 70% of the workforce holding a baccalaureate degree or higher. The proportion of LPNs/LVNs holding an associate degree or higher remained steady at around 16%.
      There is evidence that RNs and LPNs/LVNs are continuing their nursing education after obtaining their initial nursing license. Comparing the highest level of nursing education to the educational attainment when first licensed shows that proportionally more RNs hold a baccalaureate or graduate degree than did at initial licensure (51% vs. 47%). Additionally, proportionally more LPNs/LVNs hold an associate or baccalaureate as their highest level of nursing education than at initial licensure (16% vs. 8%).

      Licensure

      Overall, RNs and LPNs/LVNs are less experienced now than in previous years because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The proportion of RNs with 10 or fewer years licensed jumped from 31% in 2020 to 38% in 2022, while the proportion of LPNs/LVNs with 10 or fewer years practicing rose from 37% in 2020 to 42% in 2022. As in previous years, most RNs (96%) and LPNs/LVNs (99%) obtained their initial nursing license in the United States.

      Salary

      Increased demand from the COVID-19 pandemic and inflation led nursing incomes to rise significantly across the country, with the median RN annual earnings increasing from $70,000 in 2020 to $80,000 in 2022 and the median LPN/LVN annual earnings rising from $44,000 in 2020 to $50,000 in 2022.

      COVID-19

      Nurses were also specifically asked how the COVID-19 pandemic impacted them. More than 60% of all nurses reported an increase in their workload, while 16% of RNs and 11% of LPNs/LVNs reported changing their practice settings. More than half of all nurses reported feeling “emotionally drained from work” at least a few times each week, while more than a quarter of all nurses reported feeling “like they were at the end of their rope” at least a few times each week.

      Methods

      Sample

      A mixed-mode sampling plan was employed to capture data for the 2022 National Nursing Workforce Survey. The e-Notify nurse licensure notification system helps nurses track their licenses and discipline statuses and provides license renewal reminders. The information is provided as it is entered into the Nursys database by participating nursing regulatory bodies. After a comprehensive review of data collected through the e-Notify system, it was determined that five participating jurisdictions (Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, and Wyoming) had entered data of sufficient volume and quality so that a separate survey of nurses was unnecessary. Data for four jurisdictions (Alabama, New Hampshire, New York, and Rhode Island) were obtained from an email survey of the state nurse membership. Data for the remaining jurisdictions were collected through a direct mail survey that offered nurses the opportunity to respond via filling out and mailing back a paper survey (using a prepaid business reply envelope) or going online and accessing an online version of the survey.

      Mailing Address Lists

      For the U.S. jurisdictions and territories involved in the mailout portion of the survey, all RNs and LPNs/LVNs with an active license were eligible survey participants. A portion of the sample was drawn from Nursys, NCSBN’s licensure database. This database contains basic demographic and licensure information for RN and LPN/LVN licensees. Licensee lists and addresses were obtained directly from the following boards of nursing (BONs): (a) California (LPN/LVN), (b) Colorado, (c) Hawaii, (d) Indiana, (e) Michigan, (f) Pennsylvania, (g) Utah, and (h) Wisconsin. Georgia’s licensee lists and addresses were purchased from MMS, Inc. The BONs for American Samoa, Guam, and the Virgin Islands chose not to participate in this survey.
      As of December 31, 2021, the total number of active RN licenses in the United States was 5,239,499, and the total number of active LPN/LVN licenses was 973,788 (NCSBN, 2022). Separate RN and LPN/LVN samples stratified by state were randomly selected from among RN and LPN/LVN licensees. Surveys were mailed to 154,757 RNs and 154,490 LPNs/LVNs. Tables 1A and 2A present the sampling by jurisdiction/state for the mailout portion of the survey. Each jurisdiction is listed with the actual number of active licenses at the time of sampling. Approximately 1,000 nurses needed to respond from each jurisdiction to construct a 95% confidence of plus or minus 3% error. To calculate the number of surveys that needed to be mailed out to reach the target survey response, response rates to the online and paper surveys from the previous 2020 survey administration were used as estimates. For example, in 2020, Alaska had a 29.1% response rate for the RN survey. Given this estimated response rate, 3,340 RNs in Alaska were selected to be survey recipients in order to receive the target of 1,000 surveys. The actual response from Alaskan RNs to the current survey (i.e., the number of responses returned) was 742, a response rate of 22.1%.
      Table 1ARN Mailout Survey Response
      JurisdictionNumber of Active RN LicensesNumber of Surveys MailedUndeliverableNumber ReceivedNumber of ResponsesTotal Response Rate
      AK18,1023,440893,35174222.1%
      AR45,0164,2132513,96255714.1%
      AZ102,3644,7654904,27565615.3%
      CA466,4143,858463,81266417.4%
      CO80,9463,7622943,46858516.9%
      CT81,2423,676403,63666518.3%
      DC30,2224,2522284,02453813.4%
      DE19,2113,308243,28465820.0%
      FL347,1364,329844,24560114.2%
      GA139,3144,1062503,85649312.8%
      HI26,7853,2611363,12567821.7%
      IA58,5713,184473,13767421.5%
      ID25,8152,793482,74562922.9%
      IL219,4093,837623,77561916.4%
      IN118,8223,110173,09360819.7%
      KS53,6623,191303,16160619.2%
      KY72,0583,847353,81264116.8%
      LA65,1675,3162565,06059711.8%
      MA153,8623,7533243,42956316.4%
      MD86,8043,858623,79660315.9%
      ME27,9423,058353,02363721.1%
      MI167,7802,911482,86356119.6%
      MN119,8293,071313,04066121.7%
      MS50,4364,634854,54962613.8%
      MT20,2612,504482,45664026.1%
      ND16,7772,697562,64159122.4%
      NE31,2382,977322,94566422.5%
      NJ139,7195,347435,30486116.2%
      NV51,6064,179994,08058314.3%
      OH220,8003,449283,42155616.3%
      OK52,0393,618493,56956715.9%
      OR73,4183,461623,39977722.9%
      PA232,5283,315423,27366120.2%
      SC77,2884,020873,93367917.3%
      SD19,2372,961262,93565922.5%
      TN110,4274,065544,01164116.0%
      TX363,8654,596794,51758012.8%
      UT40,2013,450893,36166119.7%
      VA112,4823,762423,72060816.3%
      VT20,3203,379463,33371721.5%
      WI111,1922,8531102,74364923.7%
      WV33,0473,946213,92572818.5%
      Northern Mariana Islands3,618645346117311.9%
      Total4,306,972154,7574,059150,69826,75717.8%

      Email Lists

      For the four jurisdictions in the email portion of this survey, separate RN and LPN/LVN samples stratified by state were randomly selected from among RN and LPN/LVN licensees. Surveys were emailed to 26,697 RNs and 18,710 LPNs/LVNs. Tables 1B and 2B present the sampling by jurisdiction/state for the email portion of the survey. We again targeted receiving 1,000 responses from each jurisdiction and selected up to 8,000 nurses per jurisdiction for the mailing.
      Table 1BRN Email Survey Response
      JurisdictionNumber of Active RN LicensesNumber of Surveys EmailedNumber of ResponsesTotal Response Rate
      AL94,0298,0006388.0%
      NH25,6562,69734012.6%
      NY356,0838,0006998.7%
      RI27,2728,0007819.8%
      Total503,04026,6972,4589.2%

      e-Notify

      For the five jurisdictions in the e-Notify portion, the already-collected sample information was selected and unduplicated. Tables 1C and 2C show the number of nurses who contributed data to the e-Notify system.
      Table 1CRN e-Notify Data
      JurisdictionNumber of Active RN LicensesNumber of e-Notify Participants
      MO124,098124,098
      NC149,00528,301
      NM30,16023,435
      WA117,35168,199
      WY8,8735,383
      Total429,487249,416
      Note. RN = registered nurse.
      Table 2ALPN/LVN Mailout Survey Response
      JurisdictionNumber of Active LPN/LVN LicensesNumber of Surveys MailedUndeliverableNumber ReceivedNumber of ResponsesTotal Response Rate
      AK760502264768417.6%
      AR14,3174,4503314,11958014.1%
      AZ10,8255,9187785,14067613.2%
      CA106,0065,275735,20259311.4%
      CO8,0374,7395334,20657513.7%
      CT13,8284,799774,72262813.3%
      DC2,1771,3561041,2521118.9%
      DE3,1692,886422,84434912.3%
      FL61,4314,694684,62660513.1%
      GA29,7522,3982992,0991959.3%
      HI1,6801,544631,48131721.4%
      IA10,0693,412703,34264719.4%
      ID3,5263,189913,09864320.8%
      IL25,6194,657844,57365914.4%
      IN22,8943,718743,64467018.4%
      KS9,6333,510713,43960617.6%
      KY12,7454,398554,34364214.8%
      LA21,8364,8591044,75559712.6%
      MA19,8614,5895794,01055613.9%
      MD11,2804,9751584,81758412.1%
      ME1,8991,762331,72938422.2%
      MI22,4213,618823,53663117.8%
      MN19,6413,355393,31674322.4%
      MS14,0723,953653,88845411.7%
      MT2,4162,214542,16056726.3%
      ND3,4462,667692,59858522.5%
      NE5,2093,094233,07169722.7%
      NJ23,8605,297695,22867312.9%
      NV4,3933,1751563,01940813.5%
      OH53,6744,353934,26060914.3%
      OK15,5974,434864,34857613.2%
      OR6,0134,081883,99357514.4%
      PA52,7733,661723,58963517.7%
      SC12,3544,1581004,05859714.7%
      SD2,6742,232462,18645120.6%
      TN30,1404,510684,44262714.1%
      TX105,6105,3291645,16559011.4%
      UT2,8082,383432,34036415.6%
      VA27,0305,034814,95370814.3%
      VT2,5871,498141,48425417.1%
      WI15,0452,7761062,67047817.9%
      WV7,9765,003894,91470914.4%
      Northern Mariana Islands483513425.9%
      Total821,131154,4905,321149,16922,63415.2%
      Table 2BLPN/LVN Email Survey Response
      JurisdictionNumber of Active LPN/LVN LicensesNumber of Surveys EmailedNumber of ResponsesTotal Response Rate
      AL17,2488,00083110.4%
      NH3,0833003110.3%
      NY68,0608,0001,05113.1%
      RI2,5612,41026310.9%
      Total90,95218,7102,17611.6%
      Table 2CLPN/LVN e-Notify Data
      JurisdictionNumber of Active LPN/LVN LicensesNumber of e-Notify Participants
      MO24,51421,675
      NC22,7862,898
      NM2,4761,435
      WA11,0624,270
      WY867415
      Total61,70530,693
      Note. LPN/LVN = licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse.

      Survey Instrument and Materials

      The survey instrument is based on the Forum’s Minimum Nurse Supply Dataset (MDS), which was approved in 2009 after an intensive process of consensus-building and data compilation to collect data on the nursing workforce at the state level. The MDS was last updated by the Forum in 2016 to account for the transformations that had occurred in healthcare and nursing over the previous 7 years. Additionally, the 2022 survey instrument includes new questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and a question about travel nursing (Appendix A). The survey was a four-page Scantron fillable document with 39 questions. Data elements from the latest revision of the MDS were incorporated, resulting in the following changes to the survey between the 2020 and 2022 waves of data collection:
      • Response options for the race and gender questions were updated
      • A question about travel was added
      • Questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic were added
      • The question about secondary specialty were removed.

      Procedures

      Mailing Address Lists

      The Western Institutional Review Board granted approval for the current study. A unique identification number was generated and assigned to each sampled participant. The identification number was only used to record that the survey had been returned. This prevented unnecessary and expensive duplicate mailings to those selected to participate in the study. The unique access code identifier was also used for the online survey option. Once materials were developed and the sampling file was complete, surveys were distributed over a 20-week period starting the week of April 11, 2022, that included the following steps:
      • Week 1: A cover letter and paper survey were mailed via first-class U.S. mail to all nurses selected to participate. The letter included a URL and access code to take the survey online.
      • Week 10: For half of the nurses who had not responded, a cover letter reminder and paper survey were mailed via first-class U.S. mail. For the other half of the nonresponders, only the cover letter reminder was sent.
      • Week 20: For nurses who still had not responded, an additional cover letter and paper survey were mailed via first-class U.S. mail.
      • Week 25: Participants could submit their responses via mail or online until the survey closed on September 30, 2022. Once the survey was closed, the final data file was compiled separately for RNs and LPNs/LVNs.
      At weeks 1, 10, and 20, a prepaid business reply envelope was included in the mailing. Survey response data are kept on department-secured servers. NCSBN’s research staff, three key members of the Forum, and key personnel at Scantron and its strategic partner, R. R. Donnelley, had initial access to the identifiable data. Scantron no longer has access to identifiable data.

      Email Lists

      Beginning in April, Qualtrics surveys were emailed to the nurses selected for the email portion of the study. Follow-up reminders were sent to nonresponders on a weekly basis. Participants could submit their responses online until September 2022.

      e-Notify

      Data for the e-Notify portion of the survey were collected from the system in October 2022.

      Nonresponse

      A formal nonresponse bias analysis was conducted after the survey closed and weighting was applied in the analysis process. The weights adjust the distribution across states, age, and gender but sum to the actual number of RNs and LPNs/LVNs in the subsets of completed responses.
      To create the weights, an analysis of basic demographic data (i.e., gender, age, and race/ethnicity) for all RN and LPN/LVN licensees sampled from the Nursys database was used to compare survey respondents to survey nonrespondents. Results revealed that nurses who were White/Caucasian, female, and age 55 years or older may have been slightly overrepresented in both the RN and LPN/LVN samples. Because of missing or incomplete data on race/ethnicity, only gender and age were used to make nonresponse weighting adjustments. Additionally, since sampling was stratified by state, to prevent smaller states from being overrepresented in the overall analysis, a weighting variable was constructed to adjust for differing nursing population sizes across states. A description of this process can be found in Appendix B.

      Analysis

      Mailing Address Lists

      At the close of the survey, 26,757 of 150,698 successfully delivered RN surveys were completed and returned, yielding a response rate of 17.8%. There were 22,634 of 149,169 successfully delivered LPN/LVN surveys returned, resulting in a 15.2% response rate.

      Email Lists

      A total of 26,697 RNs were randomly selected for participation in the email portion of the study. The overall response rate was 9.2% or 2,458 nurses.
      A total of 18,710 LPNs/LVNs were randomly selected for participation in the email portion of the study. The overall response rate was 11.6% or 2,176 nurses.

      e-Notify

      The data for a total of 249,416 RNs and 30,693 LPNs/LVNs were collected in the e-Notify portion of the study.
      For an accurate and comprehensive view of the statistics drawn from the sample, the number of actual valid answers to each question is reported for every table. Missing data were not imputed; hence, the presented statistics represent the actual responses from participants who responded to each respective survey item. If a participant did not respond to a certain item, they were not part of the analysis for that item. Additionally, some tables display data for all responding nurse licensees while other tables display data for employed nurses. If a table is specific to nurses employed in nursing, it is explicitly stated. Many tables include bar graphs to help readers easily visualize and comprehend the data presented.

      Population Estimate

      For each question on the survey, the listed frequencies reflect the nonresponse weighting adjustments. For some of the questions, an additional set of frequencies are shown that displays the data scaled up to reflect estimates of the nursing population in the subgroup identified. For example, the 487,526 males reported in the 2022 column of Table 3 reflect the number of male respondents adjusted to the population level of the number of RNs after the nonresponse weighting adjustments were made to the survey results and after adjusting the population number to account for nurses having licenses in multiple states.
      Table 3Gender Distribution of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Gender2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 43,330.9N = 48,084.9N = 41,698.8N = 273,894.8
      Male3,459.68.04,369.39.13,915.29.430,555.811.2
      Female39,871.492.043,715.590.937,739.990.5242,508.488.5
      Nonbinary----43.60.1830.60.3
      U.S. RN Population
      Male277,5428.0354,4539.1391,1419.4487,52611.2
      Female3,198,65092.03,546,32190.93,770,33690.53,869,29088.5
      Nonbinary----4,3560.113,2520.3
      Note. “Other” was added as a response option with the 2020 survey and was renamed “nonbinary” in 2022.

      Registered Nurse Results

      Demographics

      Gender

      Respondents were asked to identify their gender. From 2015 through 2022, the percentage of male nurses grew from 8.0% to 11.2% while the percentage of female nurses decreased from 92.0% to 88.5%. The 2020 and 2022 surveys included a response option of “other” and “nonbinary,” respectively. In 2020 and 2022, this third response option represented 0.1% and 0.3% of responses, respectively. The percentage of respondents answering the question is converted to frequency data (as in all subsequent tables) of the entire U.S. RN population in the second half of Table 3.

      Age

      In 2015, the largest percentage of RNs were aged 55 to 59 years (13.6%). In 2017 and 2020, the largest percentage of RNs were aged 65 years or older (14.6% and 19.0%, respectively). In 2022, the largest percentage of RNs were tied between the age group of 30 to 34 years and 65 years or older (13.2%). While older nurses are remaining in the workforce, we are making headway on increasing younger nurses in the profession (Table 4 and Figure 1).
      Table 4Age Distribution of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Age, y2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 41,258.6N = 47,527.3N = 39.899.2N = 261,161.4
      18–293,905.29.54,594.59.73,349.58.429,085.611.1
      30–344,098.09.94,762.810.03,792.09.534,393.813.2
      35–393,928.19.54,390.69.24,006.210.030,170.411.6
      40–444,200.710.24,356.79.23,645.99.127,756.410.6
      45–494,398.210.75,250.711.13,956.59.927,855.510.7
      50–544,724.811.54,914.910.34,191.610.530,514.511.7
      55–595,622.413.65,834.412.34,502.011.323,695.59.1
      60–645,254.912.76,489.813.74,884.212.223,272.98.9
      ≥655,126.312.46,932.914.67,571.319.034,416.913.2
      U.S. RN Population
      18–29313,2919.5372,7169.7334,6268.4464,07011.1
      30–34328,7599.9386,37410.0378,8339.5548,76313.2
      35–39315,1279.5356,1759.2400,23210.0481,37811.6
      40–44337,00010.2353,4309.2364,2379.1442,86110.6
      45–49352,84310.7425,95311.1395,2679.9444,44210.7
      50–54379,04111.5398,71210.3418,75410.5486,86711.7
      55–59451,05113.6473,30312.3449,76411.3378,0689.1
      60–64421,57412.7526,46813.7487,94712.2371,3268.9
      ≥65411,25612.4562,41414.6756,39719.0549,13113.2
      Figure 1
      Figure 1Age Distribution of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Age by Gender

      The distribution of female RNs was relatively flat across all age cohorts. Interestingly, the largest cohort of female nurses was the oldest age group (≥65 years). This was markedly different than the male and nonbinary genders where the age distribution skewed toward younger age groups (Table 5).
      Table 5Age Distribution of Registered Nurses by Gender, 2022
      Age, yMale (n = 28,706.0)Female (n = 230,260.0)Nonbinary (n = 778.6)Total (N = 259,744.0)
      n%n%n%n%
      18–293,154.111.025,562.111.1244.031.328,960.211.1
      30–344,547.115.829,554.612.8144.418.634,246.113.2
      35–393,552.212.426,220.411.4144.818.629,917.511.5
      40–443,427.711.924,164.310.523.23.027,615.210.6
      45–493,313.711.524,309.710.679.610.227,703.010.7
      50–543,795.913.226,545.911.516.62.130,358.411.7
      55–592,390.28.321,103.89.260.77.823,554.79.1
      60–642,091.97.321,034.59.120.72.723,147.08.9
      ≥652,433.18.531,764.513.844.65.734,242.313.2

      Race/Ethnicity

      From 2017 to 2022, those who identified as White/Caucasian decreased from 80.8% to 80%. Nurses who reported being Asian decreased from 7.5% to 7.4%. Nurses who responded as Black/African American increased from 6.2% to 6.3%. The multiracial category increased over the same time from 1.7% to 2.5% (Table 6).
      Table 6Race of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2017–2022
      Race201720202022
      n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 47,966.3N = 41,702.0N = 272,713.6
      American Indian or Alaska Native176.00.4194.10.51,209.80.4
      Asian3,605.67.52,996.37.220,036.97.4
      Black/African American2,995.96.22,800.76.717,273.76.3
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander226.30.5175.90.41,136.90.4
      Middle Eastern/North African--89.40.2--
      White/Caucasian80.833,595.180.6218,133.980.0
      Other2.9967.72.38,133.13.0
      More than one race category selected828.51.7882.82.16,789.32.5
      U.S. RN Population
      American Indian or Alaska Native14,2760.419,3910.519,3030.4
      Asian292,4977.5299,3407.2319,6957.4
      Black/ African American243,0326.2279,7996.7275,6076.3
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander18,3620.517,5730.418,1390.4
      Middle Eastern/North African--8,9310.2--
      White/Caucasian3,144,81280.83,356,25780.63,480,38880.0
      Other110,9602.996,6762.3129,7663.0
      More than one race category selected67,2141.788,1952.1108,3252.5
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. The responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Hispanic/Latino Origin

      Respondents were asked to identify whether they were of Hispanic/Latino origin. Between 2015 and 2022, the percentage of RNs identifying as Hispanic or Latino increased from 3.6% to 6.9%. The frequency numbers represented by these percentages increased from 136,707 in 2015 to 299,640 in 2022 (Table 7).
      Table 7Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Ethnicity2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 45,989.3N = 47,852.6N = 41,483.3N = 271,920.8
      Hispanic or Latino origin1,654.03.62,528.15.32,335.95.618,780.06.9
      Not of Hispanic or Latino origin44,335.396.445,324.594.739,147.494.4253,140.893.1
      U.S. RN Population
      Hispanic or Latino origin136,7073.6205,0885.3233,3645.6299,6406.9
      Not of Hispanic or Latino origin3,556,76496.43,676,84494.73,910,94994.44,038,93393.1
      Note. In the 2015 surveys, the Hispanic/Latino ethnicity and race categories were combined into one question. The categories were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.

      Race/Ethnicity by Gender

      Male RNs tend to be more racially diverse than their female colleagues. For instance, about 81% of female RNs identify as White/Caucasian, while 74% of their male colleagues identified as such. Also, male RNs identified as Asian (11.7%) almost twice as often as female RNs (6.8%) (Table 8).
      Table 8Race of Registered Nurses by Gender, 2022
      RaceMale (n = 30,223.1)Female (n = 240,368.0)Nonbinary (n = 821.3)Total (N = 271,412.0)
      n%n%n%n%
      American Indian or Alaska Native118.00.4%1,074.70.5%13.01.6%1,205.70.4%
      Asian3,534.811.7%16,322.16.8%64.17.8%19,921.07.3%
      Black/African

      American
      1,704.85.6%15,377.26.4%38.54.7%17,120.66.3%
      Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander172.20.6%927.50.4%14.91.8%1,114.70.4%
      White/Caucasian22,396.174.1%194,534.080.9%455.755.5%217,386.080.1%
      Other1,324.14.4%6,413.42.7%184.922.5%7,922.42.9%
      More than one race category selected973.03.2%5,718.62.4%50.26.1%6,741.82.5%
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply, and responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents who selected multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Race by Age

      While younger RNs tend to be more racially diverse than older nurses, the youngest two cohorts (age groups 18–29 years and 30–34 years) are less diverse than those in slightly older cohorts. RNs between the ages of 35 and 54 years are the most diverse of all age groups (Table 9).
      Table 9Race Distribution of Registered Nurses by Age Group, 2022
      Age, ynn (%)
      American Indian or Alaska NativeAsianBlack/ African

      American
      Native Hawaiian or other Pacific IslanderWhite/ CaucasianOtherMore than

      one race
      18–2928,826.571.6 (0.3)1,977.4 (6.9)947.9 (3.3)149.8 (0.5)23,551.0 (81.7)1,083.6 (3.8)1,045.3 (3.6)
      30–3434,200.671.0 (0.2)3,008.1 (8.8)1,731.2 (5.1)176.3 (0.5)27,125.9 (79.3)915.2 (2.7)1,173.0 (3.4)
      35–3929,832.4215.5 (0.7)2,952.7 (9.9)1,756.1 (5.9)180.5 (0.6)22,842.8 (76.6)1,028.3 (3.5)856.6 (2.9)
      40–4427,513.5115.2 (0.4)2,369.0 (8.6)1,856.0 (6.8)57.9 (0.2)21,330.7 (77.5)1,150.3 (4.2)634.5 (2.3)
      45–4927,728.2203.1 (0.7)2,237.1 (8.1)2,448.1 (8.8)181.1 (0.7)21,311.8 (76.9)685.2 (2.5)662.0 (2.4)
      50–5430,356.1185.0 (0.6)3,203.3 (10.6)2,117.7 (7.0)132.4 (0.4)23,267.9 (76.7)912.4 (3.0)537.4 (1.8)
      55–5923,513.9109.2 (0.5)1,115.1 (4.7)1,745.0 (7.4)40.6 (0.2)19,462.0 (82.8)657.8 (2.8)384.2 (1.6)
      60–6423,116.185.6 (0.4)872.0 (3.8)1,381.0 (6.0)57.7 (0.3)19,663.4 (85.1)564.7 (2.4)491.8 (2.1)
      ≥6534,214.0136.5 (0.4)1,183.0 (3.5)1,951.2 (5.7)16.0 (0.1)29,863.7 (87.3)563.4 (1.7)500.3 (1.5)
      Total259,301.01,192.6 (0.5)18,917.4 (7.3)15,934.1 (6.1)992.3 (0.4)208,419.0 (80.4)7,560.9 (2.9)6,284.8 (2.4)
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply, and responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents who selected multiple race categories were reclassified into the “More than one race” category.

      Education

      Type of Nursing Degree or Credentials for First U.S. Nursing License

      From 2015 to 2022, LPN/LVN certificates ranged from 5.3% to 6%, RN diplomas decreased from 14.3% to 7.6%, associate degrees decreased from 38.5% to 35.6%, baccalaureate degrees increased from 39% to 47.2%, and master’s degrees increased from 2.8% to 4.3% (Table 10 and Figure 2).
      Table 10Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Registered Nurses (RNs) for First U.S. Nursing License, 2015–2022
      Nursing Degree or Credential2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 45,758.5N = 47,650.0N = 41,383.6N = 271,402.2
      Vocational/practical certificate2,442.15.32,850.66.02,382.85.814,898.25.5
      Diploma6,539.314.35,708.112.04,581.211.120,484.57.6
      Associate degree17,625.938.517,332.536.415,611.537.796,490.535.6
      Baccalaureate degree17,853.439.019,922.741.817,313.641.8127,989.847.2
      Master’s degree1,297.92.81,836.03.91,494.53.611,539.24.3
      U.S. RN Population
      Vocational/practical certificate195,9165.3231,2476.0238,0495.8237,7055.5
      Diploma524,60714.3463,06012.0457,67611.1326,8367.6
      Associate degree1,414,02038.51,406,06236.41,559,63837.71,539,53435.6
      Baccalaureate degree1,432,27139.01,616,18641.81,729,68341.82,042,11347.2
      Master’s degree104,1212.8148,9423.9149,3053.6184,1114.3
      Figure 2
      Figure 2Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Registered Nurses (RNs) for First U.S. Nursing License

      Type of Nursing Degree or Credential for First U.S. Nursing License by Age

      A baccalaureate degree was the most common degree for initial U.S. licensing for nurses younger than 40 years. A diploma, associate degree, and vocational/practical certificate were more common among older nurses, with 42% of RNs aged 65 years or older holding a diploma when first licensed in the United States (Table 11).
      Table 11Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Registered Nurses for First U.S. Nursing License by Age, 2022
      Age, yn (%)
      Vocational/Practical Certificate (n = 14,146.0)Diploma (n = 19,459.4)Associate Degree (n = 92,062.3)Baccalaureate Degree (n = 121,427.0)Master’s Degree (n = 10,674.1)Total (N = 257,769.0)
      18–29646.3 (4.6)620.7 (3.2)6,680.4 (7.3)20,531.2 (16.9)436.7 (4.1)28,915.4 (11.2)
      30–341,355.8 (9.6)694.4 (3.6)10,239.8 (11.1)20,651.1 (17.0)1,144.0 (10.7)34,085.1 (13.2)
      35–391,325.0 (9.4)626.5 (3.2)10,136.4 (11.0)16,171.0 (13.3)1,486.4 (13.9)29,745.3 (11.5)
      40–441,852.3 (13.1)871.9 (4.5)10,949.2 (11.9)12,310.6 (10.1)1,497.7 (14.0)27,481.7 (10.7)
      45–492,179.0 (15.4)1,024.2 (5.3)11,150.6 (12.1)11,563.8 (9.5)1,492.6 (14.0)27,410.2 (10.6)
      50–541,886.7 (13.3)2,081.2 (10.7)11,715.8 (12.7)12,594.3 (10.4)1,840.1 (17.2)30,118.0 (11.7)
      55–591,424.6 (10.1)2,456.4 (12.6)9,428.2 (10.2)8,889.3 (7.3)1,078.6 (10.1)23,277.1 (9.0)
      60–641,312.6 (9.3)2,949.8 (15.2)9,374.8 (10.2)8,493.1 (7.0)814.9 (7.6)22,945.2 (8.9)
      ≥652,163.6 (15.3)8,134.3 (41.8)12,387.2 (13.5)10,222.4 (8.4)883.2 (8.3)33,790.7 (13.1)

      Highest Level of Nursing Education

      From 2015 through 2022, diplomas in nursing decreased from 9.2% to 4.1%, associate degrees decreased from 30.1% to 24.3%, baccalaureate degrees increased from 43.4% to 51.1%, master’s degrees increased from 15.8% to 17.9%, doctoral degrees (PhD) remained static at 0.9%, doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degrees increased from 0.6% to 1.6%, and other nursing doctoral degrees increased slightly from 0.1% to 0.2% (Table 12 and Figure 3).
      Table 12Highest Level of Nursing Education of Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Nursing Education Level2015 (N = 38,625.9)2017 (N = 48,140.7)2020 (N = 41,571.5)2022 (N = 273,272.8)
      n%n%n%n%
      Diploma3,551.39.23,547.77.42,782.86.711,124.24.1
      Associate degree11,608.830.113,729.128.511,683.228.166,312.124.3
      Baccalaureate degree16,762.543.421,744.145.219,998.548.1139,614.951.1
      Master’s degree6,085.115.88,238.317.16,200.514.949,011.817.9
      Doctoral degree: PhD340.20.9284.10.6281.20.72,345.70.9
      Doctoral degree: DNP239.10.6551.21.1569.11.44,272.71.6
      Doctoral degree: other39.00.146.10.156.10.1591.30.2
      Note. DNP = doctor of nursing practice. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.
      Figure 3
      Figure 3Highest Level of Nursing Education of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Highest Level of Nursing Education by Gender

      Proportionally, more males were awarded doctoral degrees (PhD = 14.0% and DNP = 13.2%) relative to any other degree (Table 13).
      Table 13Gender of Registered Nurses by Highest Level of Nursing Education, 2022
      Weighted Sample ValuesMaleFemaleNonbinary
      Nursing Education Leveln%n%n%N
      Diploma780.77.1%10,174.092.8%12.30.1%10,966.9
      Associate degree7,704.011.7%58,073.588.0%181.60.3%65,959.1
      Baccalaureate degree15,639.011.3%122,797.088.5%398.80.3%138,835.0
      Master’s degree5,247.910.8%43,155.788.8%224.20.5%48,627.8
      Doctoral degree: PhD321.714.0%1,974.585.8%4.90.2%2,301.2
      Doctoral degree: DNP565.313.2%3,703.586.8%0.00.0%4,268.8
      Doctoral degree: other61.511.3%485.588.8%0.00.0%547.0
      Total30,320.111.2%240,363.088.5%821.90.3%271,505.0
      Note. DNP = doctor of nursing practice. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.

      Highest Level of Nursing Education by Race

      The baccalaureate nursing degree was the most common highest level of education across all racial groups. For RNs identifying as Asian, about 71% reported holding a baccalaureate degree, which is the highest proportion across all racial categories. A little less than half of White/Caucasian, Black/African American, and American Indian or Alaska Native respondents held a baccalaureate degree (Table 14).
      Table 14Highest Level of Nursing Education of Registered Nurses by Race and Ethnicity, 2022
      RaceNursing Education Level, n (%)n
      DiplomaAssociateBaccalaureateMaster’sDoctoral (PhD)Doctoral (DNP)Doctoral (other)
      American Indian or Alaska Native61.2 (5.1)346.6 (28.7)586.3 (48.5)165.7 (13.7)14.9 (1.2)33.3 (2.8)0.0 (0.0)1,208.0
      Asian549.2 (2.8)1,919.5 (9.6)14,175.0 (71.1)3,119.0 (15.6)35.0 (0.2)145.8 (0.7)6.4 (0.0)19,949.9
      Black/African American452.6 (2.7)3,718.6 (21.8)8,405.9 (49.3)3,868.0 (22.7)220.7 (1.3)339.6 (2.0)45.6 (0.3)17,051.0
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander69.0 (6.1)113.5 (10.0)662.4 (58.4)278.7 (24.6)4.8 (0.4)6.3 (0.6)0.1 (0.0)1,134.7
      White/Caucasian9,535.9 (4.4)56,320.0 (26.0)106,344.0 (49.1)38,608.1 (17.8)1,910.2 (0.9)3,343.2 (1.5)473.9 (0.2)216,535.0
      Other171.1 (2.2)1,705.9 (21.4)4,347.7 (54.6)1,487.5 (18.7)60.5 (0.8)181.6 (2.3)10.3 (0.1)7,964.6
      More than one race category selected138.9 (2.1)1,438.0 (21.6)3,767.2 (56.7)1,051.5 (15.8)68.4 (1.0)171.6 (2.6)10.9 (0.2)6,646.6
      Total10,977.7 (4.1)65,562.1 (24.2)138,288.0 (51.1)48,578.7 (18.0)2,314.5 (0.9)4,221.4 (1.6)547.3 (0.2)270,490.0
      Hispanic/Latino279.3 (1.5)4,570.7 (24.6)9,776.5 (52.5)3,411.9 (18.3)90.3 (0.5)445.6 (2.4)39.5 (0.2)18,613.7
      Note. DNP = doctor of nursing practice. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey. For the race question, respondents were asked to select all that apply, and responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Highest Level of Nursing Education by Age

      Younger nurses (aged 18–39 years) tended to hold a baccalaureate degree as their highest level of nursing education while older nurses tended to have a nursing diploma or associate degree as their highest level of nursing education. RNs older than 35 years were somewhat more likely to hold an advanced nursing degree (i.e., master’s, PhD, or DNP) than their younger colleagues (Table 15).
      Table 15Age of Registered Nurses by Highest Level of Nursing Education, 2022
      Weighted Sample ValuesAge, y, n (%)n
      Nursing Education Level18–2930–3435–3940–4445–4950–5455–5960–64≥65
      Diploma377.2 (3.6)349.2 (3.3)301.6 (2.8)331.1 (3.1)369.6 (3.5)1,023.2 (9.6)1,160.0 (10.9)1,736.1 (16.3)4,990.6 (46.9)10,638.5
      Associate degree4,184.5 (6.6)6,457.3 (10.2)5,649.1 (8.9)6,953.4 (11.0)7,273.2 (11.5)8,172.8 (12.9)7,140.5 (11.3)7,435.2 (11.8)9,928.6 (15.7)63,194.6
      Baccalaureate degree22,559.8 (17.0)21,493.3 (16.2)16,956.4 (12.8)13,505 (10.2)13,520.9 (10.2)14,217.4 (10.7)9886 (7.5)8930.1 (6.7)11,570.3 (8.7)132,639.0
      Master’s degree1,621.2 (3.5)5,229.0 (11.3)6,279.2 (13.6)6,117.1 (13.2)5,858.2 (12.7)6,049.4 (13.1)4,526.8 (9.8)4,250.9 (9.2)6,356.4 (13.7)46,288.1
      Doctoral degree: PhD19.2 (0.9)112.4 (5.0)233.6 (10.3)7,273.2 (8.5)271.7 (12.0)210.6 (9.3)378.1 (16.7)323.4 (14.3)519.9 (23.0)2,261.8
      Doctoral degree: DNP176.5 (4.3)558.3 (13.5)561.3 (13.6)540.9 (13.1)432.7 (10.5)593.3 (14.3)465.7 (11.3)361.6 (8.7)449.5 (10.9)4,139.7
      Doctoral degree: other0.0 (0.0)27.7 (5.5)78.4 (15.5)29.5 (5.8)48.8 (9.7)46.1 (9.1)17.4 (3.5)66.3 (13.1)191.6 (37.9)505.8
      Total28,938.3 (11.1)34,227.3 (13.2)30,059.5 (11.6)27,669.8 (10.7)27,775.1 (10.7)30,312.7 (11.7)23,574.6 (9.1)23,103.6 (8.9)34,006.7 (13.1)259,668.0
      Note. DNP = doctor of nursing practice. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.

      Highest Level of Non-nursing Education

      From 2017 through 2022, non-nursing associate degrees decreased from 35.3% to 33.9%, baccalaureate degrees increased from 45.8% to 50.2%, master’s degrees decreased from 15.8% to 13.9%, and doctoral degrees decreased from 3.1% to 2.1% (Table 16 and Figure 4).
      Table 16Highest Level of Non-nursing Education of Registered Nurses, 2017–2022
      Nursing Education Level2017 (N = 19,904.5)2020 (N = 17,698.1)2022 (N = 113,020.7)
      n%n%n%
      Associate degree7,025.935.36,578.137.238,27533.9
      Baccalaureate degree9,115.445.88,141.546.056,70650.2
      Master’s degree3,150.815.82,547.414.415,66013.9
      Doctoral degree612.43.1431.12.42,3802.1
      Note. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.
      Figure 4
      Figure 4Highest Level of Non-nursing Education of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Licensure

      Type of License Currently Held

      Like previous years, less than 1% of responding RNs held an LPN/LVN license, while 9.8% held an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN) credential. The percentage of RNs holding an APRN credential has recovered from 6.6% in 2020 but is still lower than the 10% in 2017 (Table 17 and Figure 5).
      Table 17Type of License Currently Held by Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      License2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey ResponseN = 46,047.8N = 48,128.0N = 41,601.8N = 252,623.7
      RN43,730.295.045,971.395.540,378.397.1239,838.694.9
      LPN/LVN330.80.7386.20.8323.60.82,109.20.8
      APRN3,974.78.64,788.610.02,763.26.624,633.49.8
      U.S. RN Population
      RN3,508,21995.03,729,31895.54,033,92097.13,826,69294.9
      LPN/LVN26,5340.731,3280.832,3290.833,6530.8
      APRN318,8708.6388,46110.0276,0526.6393,0329.8
      Note. RN = registered nurse; LPN/LVN = licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse; APRN = advanced practice registered nurse. Respondents were asked to select all that apply.
      Figure 5
      Figure 5Type of License Currently Held by Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Number of Years Licensed

      RN respondents were licensed for a median of 15 years, as compared to 20 years in the 2020 survey. More than one-third (37.9%) were licensed for 10years or less, the highest since 2015. An additional 24.6% were licensed between 11 and 20years, resulting in more than 62% of RNs reporting fewer than 20years of being licensed. The percent licensed for more than 20years was at the lowest level in 2022 (37.6%) since 2015 (47%)—nearly 10 percentage points less (Table 18 and Figure 6).
      Table 18Number of Years the Registered Nurse Has Been Licensed, 2015–2022
      Years Licensed2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 39,771.5N = 46,757.6N = 38,741.0N = 255,537.8
      0–1013,307.333.515,397.632.911,802.630.596,801.637.9
      11–207,753.419.59,217.719.78,577.422.162,790.224.6
      21–306,855.817.28,121.617.46,934.117.942,027.916.5
      31–407,311.418.48,226.117.65,951.615.429,614.811.6
      ≥414,543.711.45,794.612.45,475.414.124,303.19.5
      U.S. RN Population
      0–101,067,56933.51,249,09632.91,179,11730.51,544,49737.9
      11–20622,00919.5747,76719.7856,90922.11,001,83524.6
      21–30549,99717.2658,84417.4692,73917.9670,56616.5
      3–40586,54718.4667,32617.6594,58415.4472,51311.6
      ≥ 41364,51111.4470,07312.4547,01014.1387,7639.5
      Figure 6
      Figure 6Number of Years Registered Nurses (RNs) Have Been Licensed

      Country Where Entry-Level Education Was Received

      Most RNs (94.8%) reported obtaining their entry-level nursing education in the United States in 2022, a slight increase from the 93.9% who reported the same in 2020. Another 2.8% obtained their entry-level nursing education in the Philippines, 0.5% in Canada, and 0.4% in India (Table 19).
      Table 19Country of Entry-Level Nursing Education of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2020–2022
      Country20202022
      n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 41,745.5N = 252,307.9
      United States39,192.593.9239,250.294.8
      Canada224.70.51,256.50.5
      Philippines1,360.33.37,089.62.8
      India212.80.5883.80.4
      Other755.21.83,827.91.5
      U.S. RN Population
      United States3,915,45593.93,817,30494.8
      Canada22,4480.520,0480.5
      Philippines135,8983.3113,1162.8
      India21,2590.514,1010.4
      Other75,4471.861,0751.5

      Credentials to Practice as an APRN

      Respondents were asked whether they were credentialed as an APRN in their state, enabling them to practice in any of the four APRN roles: nurse practitioner (NP), clinical nurse specialist (CNS), certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA), or certified nurse midwife (CNM). Most respondents (88.4%) indicated they were not credentialed to practice as an APRN. This represents a lower proportion of RNs not credentialed as an APRN compared to 91.6% in 2020. In 2022, 8.6% of respondents reported being credentialed as a NP, compared to 5.5% in 2020 (Table 20 and Figure 7).
      Table 20Registered Nurse (RN) Credentials to Practice as an APRN, 2015–2022
      Credential2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 43,045.0N = 47,713.6N = 41,129.2N = 271,194.6
      Nurse practitioner3,129.47.24,067.18.52,257.15.523,188.18.6
      Clinical nurse specialist576.81.3983.52.1769.21.95,466.02.0
      Certified registered nurse anesthetist571.91.3728.71.5399.70.92,959.51.1
      Certified nurse midwife167.70.4242.00.5192.00.5994.20.4
      Not licensed/certified as any above38,599.389.742,004.288.037,677.691.6239,699.188.4
      U.S. RN Population
      Nurse practitioner251,0537.2329,9338.5225,4915.5369,9728.6
      Clinical nurse specialist46,2751.379,7872.176,8461.987,2122.0
      Certified registered nurse anesthetist45,8791.359,1141.539,9310.947,2191.1
      Certified nurse midwife13,4520.419,6360.519,1810.515,8630.4
      Not licensed/certified as any above3,096,59589.73,407,49888.03,764,11291.63,824,46788.4
      Note. APRN = advanced practice registered nurse.
      Figure 7
      Figure 7Registered Nurses (RNs) Credentialed as Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs)

      Multistate Licensure

      Currently Hold a Multistate License

      From 2020 through 2022, multistate licensure among RNs increased by 6.3% from 24.0% to 30.3% (Table 21).
      Table 21Registered Nurses Holding a Multistate License, 2020–2022
      Multistate License2020 (N = 34,825.9)2022 (N = 214,686.7)
      n%n%
      Yes8,367.424.065,087.730.3
      No26,458.576.0149,599.169.7
      Note. Respondents were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Use of Multistate License

      In 2022, 32.2% of RNs with multistate licenses had used them. In addition to telehealth, distance education, and disaster support, they were used for travel nursing and multistate practice Table 22).
      Table 22How a Multistate License is Used by Registered Nurses, 2022
      Use of Multistate License2022 (N = 66,014.3)
      n%
      Telehealth5,850.08.9
      Distance education1,686.02.6
      Disaster support1,800.62.7
      Have not used44,777.267.8
      Other13,472.220.4
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. Respondents were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Employment

      Employment Status

      The majority of responding RNs (88.9%) were actively employed in nursing, with 70.2% employed full time. Compared with 2020 survey results, this represents a 4.8% increase in the proportion of RNs actively employed and a 5.3% increase in those working full time. The proportion of RNs who are actively employed in nursing is at the highest level since 2015 (Table 23 and Figure 8).
      Table 23Employment Status of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Employment Status2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 46,210.2N = 48,146.9N = 41,783.4N = 277,034.9
      Actively employed in nursing full time29,088.562.931,476.665.427,101.064.9194,565.370.2
      Actively employed in nursing part time6,088.013.25,820.912.14,901.711.730,268.810.9
      Actively employed in nursing per diem3,675.28.03,424.97.13,133.67.521,526.37.8
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing full time1,576.13.41,108.92.3882.42.15,098.31.8
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing part time850.81.8605.71.3438.51.12,727.81.0
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing per diem377.70.8267.50.6188.50.51,521.20.6
      Working in nursing only as a volunteer564.51.2645.61.3517.11.22,553.80.9
      Unemployed, seeking work as a nurse1,070.72.31,030.22.1809.11.95,443.92.0
      Unemployed, not seeking work as a nurse1,611.63.51,616.23.41,362.43.37,223.82.6
      Retired4,993.710.84,916.910.24,824.711.623,038.18.3
      U.S. RN Population
      Actively employed in nursing full time2,333,60662.92,553,46765.42,707,47664.93,104,34470.2
      Actively employed in nursing part time488,40513.2472,20412.1489,69511.7482,94610.9
      Actively employed in nursing per diem294,8378.0277,8347.1313,0577.5343,4587.8
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing full time126,4453.489,9562.388,1552.181,3451.8
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing part time68,2551.849,1391.343,8081.143,5221.0
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing per diem30,2980.821,7020.618,8320.524,2710.6
      Working in nursing only as a volunteer45,2881.252,3741.351,6601.240,7460.9
      Unemployed, seeking work as a nurse85,8962.383,5732.180,8321.986,8592.0
      Unemployed, not seeking work as a nurse129,2873.5131,1143.4136,1083.3115,2582.6
      Retired400,61310.8398,87110.2482,00311.6367,5808.3
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply.
      Figure 8
      Figure 8Employment Status of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Reasons for Being Unemployed

      Taking care of home and family was the most frequently reported reason for being unemployed (reported by 46.8% of respondents). About 22% attributed their unemployment to the COVID-19 pandemic. Almost 12% of RNs stated they were unemployed because of “inadequate salary.” This represents a marked increase in the reporting of an inadequate salary, as the proportion of RNs reporting an inadequate salary in 2020 was 2.5%. The percentage of RNs who indicated unemployment because they had trouble in finding a nursing position was 10.7%, which was down from 14.6% in 2020. The percentage of RNs who listed “disabled” as the reason for unemployment was 7.2%, and 9.5% listed “school” as the reason for unemployment (Table 24 and Figure 9).
      Table 24Reasons for Unemployment of Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Reasons for Unemployment2015 (N = 2,272.4)2017 (N = 2,567.2)2020 (N = 2,122.1)2022 (N = 12,397.1)
      n%n%n%n%
      Taking care of home and family1137.350.01226.847.81,039.549.05,805.846.8
      Disabled298.513.1347.613.5226.410.7893.97.2
      Inadequate salary48.22.173.72.953.72.51,477.711.9
      School143.16.3186.07.2172.28.11,171.19.5
      Difficulty in finding a nursing position352.015.5395.015.4310.314.61,327.610.7
      COVID-19 pandemic------2,433.522.6
      Other557.424.5758.929.6680.232.14,486.636.2
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were unemployed. Respondents were asked to select all that apply.
      Figure 9
      Figure 9Reasons for Unemployment of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Retirement Plans

      More than a quarter (28.7%) of RNs reported they plan to retire within the next 5 years. This finding represents a 6.6% increase over the proportion who thought they would retire within 5years (22.1%) in the 2020 survey (Table 25).
      Table 25Registered Nurse (RN) Plans to Retire or Leave Nursing, 2020–2022
      Plan to Retire Within 5Years20202022
      n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 34,360.2N = 216,831.7
      Yes7,584.522.162,234.828.7
      No26,775.877.9154,597.071.3
      U.S. RN Population
      Yes757,71622.1992,97428.7
      No2,674,98777.92,466,63971.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Number of Positions Currently Held

      Respondents were asked to identify the number of positions in which they were currently employed as a nurse. Most respondents (82.4%) reported holding just one position as a nurse, which represents a 0.5% increase when compared to 2020. The percentage of RNs who reported working in two positions increased from 13.7% in 2020 to 15.0% in 2022. The percentage of respondents who indicated that they held three or more positions in nursing also slightly increased from 2.4% in 2020 to 2.6% in 2022 (Table 26).
      Table 26Number of Positions Currently Held by Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Number of Positions Held2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 37,114.2N = 39,414.3N = 33,992.6N = 235,732.0
      131,499.384.932,827.283.328,516.383.9194,280.182.4
      24,744.012.85,496.713.94,664.113.735,280.215.0
      ≥3870.82.41,090.52.8812.22.46,171.72.6
      U.S. RN Population
      12,527,01084.92,663,03083.32,848,86983.93,099,79482.4
      2380,58512.8445,90513.9465,95813.7562,90515.0
      ≥369,8612.488,4632.881,1412.498,4712.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.

      Number of Hours Worked During a Typical Week in All Nursing Positions

      More than half (54.6%) of responding RNs reported working 32 to 40hours in a typical week in all positions. This is a decrease from the results from the 2020 (58.7%) and the 2017 survey findings (58.6%). The second most frequently reported category was 41 to 50hours (19%), which is higher than that reported for 2020 (14.5%) and 2017 (15.8%) (Table 27 and Figure 10).
      Table 27Number of Hours Registered Nurses (RNs) Worked During a Typical Week in All Nursing Positions, 2015–2022
      Hours Worked per Week2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 36,327.6N = 39,293.3N = 33,847.5N = 235,197.9
      1–151,697.74.71,903.74.81,624.04.88,482.53.6
      16–231,655.74.61,728.14.41,402.34.17,897.33.4
      24–313,536.99.83,765.09.63,251.09.620,715.08.8
      32–4021,174.358.423,012.658.619,850.658.7128,375.154.6
      41–505,957.316.46,198.015.84,915.114.544,684.819.0
      51–601,636.94.51,851.34.71,479.94.414,197.56.0
      ≥61578.81.6834.72.11,324.53.910,845.74.6
      U.S. RN Population
      1–15136,2004.7154,4344.8162,2434.8135,3403.6
      16–23132,8264.6140,1904.4140,0944.1126,0043.4
      24–31283,7459.8305,4269.6324,7859.6330,5138.8
      32–401,698,69258.41,866,84158.61,983,13858.72,048,26154.6
      41–50477,91816.4502,79615.8491,03414.5712,95919.0
      51–60131,3184.5150,1804.7147,8474.4226,5256.0
      ≥6146,4321.667,7122.1132,3223.9173,0464.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 10
      Figure 10Number of Hours Registered Nurses (RNs) Worked in All Nursing Positions

      Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting

      About 57% of RNs indicated that a hospital was their primary nursing practice. This represents an increase of 2.7 percentage points from 2020. Ambulatory care setting was the second most frequently selected setting by 10.4% of RNs, followed by nursing home/extended care at 3.9% and home health setting selected by 3.4%. School health service as a selection dropped from 3.1% in 2020 to 2.3% in 2022. Nurses selecting public health also increased to 1.7% in 2022, up from 1.2 in 2020. Insurance claims/benefits respondents dropped to 2.0% in 2022, down from 2.5% in 2020 (Table 28 and Figure 11).
      Table 28Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Practice Setting2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 37,372.1N = 38,870.1N = 33,640.6N = 232,872.0
      Hospital20,311.954.421,646.555.718,441.854.8133,911.757.5
      Nursing home/extended care1,807.24.81,859.74.81,486.74.49,024.83.9
      Assisted living facility233.30.6211.20.5177.50.51,187.30.5
      Home health2,288.06.11,685.94.31,501.74.57,818.43.4
      Hospice--757.82.0674.32.04,175.61.8
      Correctional facility259.60.7294.80.8277.70.81,525.40.7
      School of nursing1,357.03.61,028.92.7954.12.84,908.92.1
      Public health595.41.6539.31.4407.51.23,832.21.7
      Dialysis center--493.61.3386.81.22,643.91.1
      Community health786.92.1780.82.0565.31.74,655.22.0
      School health service1,092.82.91,025.32.61,057.83.15,441.82.3
      Occupational health250.30.7292.60.8230.70.71,642.90.7
      Ambulatory care setting4,201.111.23,649.29.43,271.69.724,267.210.4
      Insurance claims/benefits673.71.8694.11.8841.12.54,642.62.0
      Policy/planning/regulatory/licensing agency148.70.486.90.288.10.3746.50.3
      Other3,366.39.03,823.69.83,278.09.722,447.49.6
      U.S. RN Population
      Hospital1,629,50654.41,756,02155.71,842,39454.82,136,59957.5
      Nursing home/extended care144,9824.8150,8654.8148,5264.4143,9943.9
      Assisted living facility18,7180.617,1320.517,7330.518,9430.5
      Home health183,5536.1136,7654.3150,0254.5124,7443.4
      Hospice--61,4712.067,3652.066,6231.8
      Correctional facility20,8280.723,9180.827,7430.824,3380.7
      School of nursing108,8633.683,4662.795,3182.878,3242.1
      Public health47,7631.643,7481.440,7111.261,1431.7
      Dialysis center--40,0401.338,6431.242,1851.1
      Community health63,1282.163,3372.056,4751.774,2752.0
      School health service87,6662.983,1782.6105,6783.186,8262.3
      Occupational health20,0800.723,7360.823,0480.726,2130.7
      Ambulatory care setting337,02811.2296,0309.4326,8439.7387,19010.4
      Insurance claims/benefits54,0461.856,3061.884,0292.574,0752.0
      Policy/planning/regulatory/licensing agency11,9300.47,0500.28,8010.311,9100.3
      Other270,0579.0310,1789.8327,4839.7358,1559.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 11
      Figure 11Most-Reported Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Primary Nursing Position Title

      More than half (56%) of RNs reported their nursing position title as a staff nurse in 2022. This is down slightly from 2020, when 60% identified as a staff nurse. The title of case manager accounted for 10.9% of nursing titles, which is an increase from 7.4% in the 2020 survey. Additionally, the proportion of APRNs grew in 2022 to 9.7% from 6.3% in 2020 (Table 29 and Figure 12).
      Table 29Primary Nursing Position Title of Registered Nurses (RNs), 2015–2022
      Primary Title2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 37,711.1N = 39,063.1N = 33,713.7N = 233,841.4
      Consultant672.41.8577.41.5531.71.62,782.61.2
      Nurse researcher247.20.7235.90.6155.60.51,140.60.5
      Nurse executive881.42.3725.31.9647.71.94,326.31.9
      Nurse manager3,045.88.13,126.28.02,673.37.917,149.07.3
      Nurse faculty/educator1,422.23.81,558.24.01,392.54.17,673.03.3
      APRN3,069.18.13,946.110.12,130.26.322,782.19.7
      Staff nurse21,920.758.122,673.058.020,265.960.1132,070.756.5
      Case manager2,524.86.72,519.26.42,485.37.425,478.910.9
      Other – health related3,685.19.83,561.99.13,277.49.717,964.27.7
      Other – not health related242.50.6139.70.4154.20.52,474.01.1
      U.S. RN Population
      Consultant53,9441.846,8441.553,1191.644,3971.2
      Nurse researcher19,8300.719,1390.615,5450.518,1990.5
      Nurse executive70,7062.358,8361.964,7071.969,0271.9
      Nurse manager244,3438.1253,6098.0267,0717.9273,6177.3
      Nurse faculty/educator114,0993.8126,4084.0139,1154.1122,4253.3
      APRN246,2148.1320,12110.1212,8146.3363,4959.7
      Staff nurse1,758,57358.11,839,29458.02,024,62860.12,107,22556.5
      Case manager202,5466.7204,3686.4248,2897.4406,52310.9
      Other – health related295,6379.8288,9509.1327,4239.7286,6257.7
      Other – not health related19,4530.611,3320.415,4050.539,4731.1
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 12
      Figure 12Most Reported Primary Nursing Position Title of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Traveling Nurse Position

      In the 2022 survey, a new question was added: “Are you currently a travel nurse?” About 6% of RNs reported currently being a travel nurse (Table 30).
      Table 30Registered Nurses in Travel Nursing, 2022
      Travel Nurse2022
      n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 215,429.5
      Yes13,296.06.2
      No202,133.593.8
      U.S. RN Population
      Yes212,1426.2
      No3,225,09793.8
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Primary Nursing Position Specialty

      In 2022, 16.5% of RNs reported that their primary practice specialty was acute care/critical care. This increased from the 13.4% reported in 2020. The second most reported specialty position in 2022 was medical-surgical at 10.0% (compared to 8.5% reported in 2020). Emergency/trauma was the third most often reported practice specialty (8.1%), an increase from 5.6% reported in 2020. The proportion of RNs reporting other nonclinical specialties grew to 5.6% of respondents in 2022 from the 3.2% reported in 2020 (Table 31 and Figure 13).
      Table 31Primary Nursing Position Specialty of Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Primary Specialty2015 (N = 36,424.1)2017 (N = 37,484.3)2020 (N = 32,364.8)2022 (N = 199,133.7)
      n%n%n%n%
      Acute care/critical care4,159.111.45,239.214.04,338.513.432,897.216.5
      Adult health756.12.11,447.13.91,172.93.65,069.82.6
      Anesthesia549.91.5705.51.9379.41.23,516.51.8
      Cardiology--1,291.03.41,086.03.47,394.43.7
      Community356.71.0386.61.0300.90.91,920.11.0
      Emergency/trauma2,026.75.62,027.35.41,818.45.616,108.58.1
      Family health--1,243.43.3801.22.55,251.32.6
      Genetics40.60.1----328.60.2
      Geriatric/gerontology1,754.74.81,918.55.11,614.25.08,796.84.4
      Home health1,604.04.41,360.13.61,226.13.85,890.73.0
      Informatics318.20.9----1,071.70.5
      Information technology------255.70.1
      Maternal-child health/obstetrics1,633.94.51,778.14.71,422.34.48,892.74.5
      Medical-surgical3,695.710.13,203.18.62,757.88.519,876.010.0
      Neonatal808.42.2809.52.2725.42.24,750.52.4
      Nephrology476.41.3555.71.5500.71.63,237.71.6
      Neurology/neurosurgical337.10.9----1,924.31.0
      Occupational health280.70.8339.80.9314.41.01,892.81.0
      Oncology1,044.02.91,046.92.8955.93.06,514.03.3
      Orthopedic436.11.2----2,373.41.2
      Palliative care/hospice529.11.5643.31.7522.21.64,099.72.1
      Pediatrics1,570.34.31,774.14.71,345.94.29,652.44.9
      Perioperative2,195.76.02,187.75.82,173.26.712,690.46.4
      Primary care1,092.53.0----4,661.52.3
      Public health466.01.3472.31.3428.91.33,440.51.7
      Psychiatric/mental health/substance abuse1,418.43.91,534.14.11,206.83.75,036.12.5
      Radiology191.20.5----376.80.2
      Rehabilitation717.32.0725.41.9541.41.71,847.20.9
      School health1,025.12.8945.52.5980.03.02,469.01.2
      Urology87.50.2----65.70.0
      Women’s health651.71.8567.11.5490.51.52,111.81.1
      Other - clinical specialties--4,507.712.04,229.513.13,566.01.8
      Other - nonclinical specialties--775.12.11,032.13.211,154.05.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 13
      Figure 13Most Reported Primary Nursing Position Specialty of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Providing Direct Patient Care—Primary Nursing Position

      In 2022, 72.5% of RN respondents reported providing direct patient care in their primary nursing position. In 2020, the first year this question was asked, 68.6% of nurses said they provided direct patient care in their primary nursing position (Table 32).
      Table 32Registered Nurses (RNs) Providing Direct Patient Care—Primary Nursing Position, 2020–2022
      Providing Direct Patient Care20202022
      n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 34,080.7N = 215,838.4
      Yes23,391.868.6156,539.872.5
      No10,688.931.459,298.627.5
      U.S. RN Population
      Yes2,336,91568.62,497,63772.5
      No1,067,85531.4946,12627.5
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Secondary Nursing Practice Position Setting

      Of the 17.6% of RNs who reported having more than one nursing position (Table 26), 34.7% reported practicing in a hospital setting, 9.2% in a nursing home/extended care, and 8.8% in an ambulatory care setting. Of the more common practice settings, the proportion of RNs practicing in a nursing home/extended care setting grew 2% and those practicing in nursing schools dropped by 1.6%, from 8.7% in 2020 to 7.1% in 2022 (Table 33 and Figure 14).
      Table 33Secondary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Secondary Practice Setting2015 (N = 4,877.3)2017 (N = 6,153.3)2020 (N = 5,121.6)2022 (N = 39,004.5)
      n%n%n%n%
      Hospital1,632.633.52,213.436.01,879.136.713,548.134.7
      Nursing home/extended care277.25.7456.77.4363.87.13,575.29.2
      Assisted living facility58.91.258.41.058.31.1815.62.1
      Home health577.511.8555.79.0430.18.42,977.17.6
      Hospice--185.93.0139.32.71,122.32.9
      Correctional facility72.21.568.31.146.20.9403.51.0
      School of nursing519.710.7493.68.0446.28.72,776.47.1
      Public health38.10.889.21.568.91.3935.72.4
      Dialysis center--87.71.454.71.1521.71.3
      Community health191.13.9209.63.4121.62.41,002.72.6
      School health service171.73.5173.02.8113.22.21,006.02.6
      Occupational health39.00.857.10.936.30.7564.01.5
      Ambulatory care setting451.29.3556.79.1492.69.63,438.98.8
      Insurance claims/benefits39.40.851.70.844.10.9565.51.5
      Policy/planning/regulatory/licensing agency6.10.17.10.122.50.4145.20.4
      Other802.516.5889.314.5806.915.85,606.514.4
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 14
      Figure 14Most Reported Secondary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Secondary Nursing Position Title

      Of those RNs who had more than one nursing position, 52.9% of respondents were staff nurses. This represents a decline from 2020 when 57.6% of nurses were staff nurses. About 15% of RN respondents had other health-related titles and 12.6% were APRNs. As with the primary position titles previously listed, the proportion of respondents reporting being an APRN increased by 3.9% from 2020 (Table 34 and Figure 15).
      Table 34Secondary Nursing Practice Position Title of Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Secondary Title2015 (N = 4,857.8)2017 (N = 6,145.9)2020 (N = 5,080.8)2022 (N = 38,665.7)
      n%n%n%n%
      Consultant216.04.5201.23.3165.63.31,085.52.8
      Nurse researcher28.90.636.20.621.90.4300.40.8
      Nurse executive46.61.034.60.640.30.8245.20.6
      Nurse manager143.23.0235.43.8196.23.91,408.73.6
      Nurse faculty/educator482.09.9601.59.8547.010.83,135.38.1
      APRN521.810.7743.012.1443.98.74,887.612.6
      Staff nurse2,767.957.03,430.855.82,924.957.620,461.252.9
      Case manager157.83.4256.34.2205.54.1866.92.2
      Other – health related475.09.8573.79.3490.29.75,800.515.0
      Other – not health related18.60.433.30.545.30.9474.21.2
      Note. Survey participants were asked about their secondary nursing practice title only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 15
      Figure 15Most Reported Secondary Nursing Position Title of Registered Nurses (RNs)

      Providing Direct Patient Care—Secondary Nursing Practice Position

      In 2022, 75.4% of RN respondents reported providing direct patient care in their secondary nursing position. In 2020, the first year this question was asked, 72.0% of nurses said they provided direct patient care in their secondary nursing position (Table 35).
      Table 35Providing Direct Patient Care—Secondary Nursing Position of Registered Nurses, 2020–2022
      Providing Direct Patient Care2020 (N = 5,076.1)2022 (N = 35,791.8)
      n%n%
      Yes3,653.372.026,985.575.4
      No1,422.728.08,806.324.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Annual Earnings

      2022 Pretax Annual Earnings From Primary Nursing Position

      The median pretax annual earnings for RNs grew to $80,000 in 2022. Pretax wages grew by 14% since 2020 when the median pretax annual wage was $70,000. The percentage of respondents earning less than $40,000 annually (7.5%) decreased by 3.9%; those earning between $40,000 and $60,000 (13.9%) decreased by 5.3% between 2020 and 2022. The percentage of respondents in categories making between $60,000 and $80,000 per year (27.7%) also showed a decline of 2.2%. Between 2020 and 2022, the proportion of RNs making between $80,00 and $100,000 (22.3%) increased by 3.2%, and those making more than $100,000 per year (28.7%) increased by 8.2% (Table 36 and Figure 16).
      Table 36Annual Earnings of Registered Nurses (RNs) From Primary Nursing Position, 2015–2022
      Annual Earnings2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 32,455.7N = 35,745.6N = 29,453.8N = 181,491.9
      <$40,0004,711.314.54,217.811.83,355.611.413,599.27.5
      $40,000 to <$60,0008,436.826.08,243.423.15,639.519.225,203.813.9
      $60,000 to <$80,0009,202.028.410,213.328.68,808.029.950,193.627.7
      $80,000 to <$100,0005,279.816.36,386.317.95,617.019.140,376.622.3
      ≥$100,0004,825.714.96,684.818.76,033.820.552,118.828.7
      U.S. RN Population
      <$40,000377,96414.5342,16011.8335,23511.4216,9797.5
      $40,000 to <$60,000676,83726.0668,72923.1563,40419.2402,13313.9
      $60,000 to <$80,000738,22428.4828,53028.6879,94729.9800,85327.7
      $80,000 to <$100,000423,56816.3518,07117.9561,15619.1644,22022.3
      ≥$100,000387,13614.9542,29218.7602,79620.5831,57028.7
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.
      Figure 16
      Figure 16Annual Earnings of Registered Nurses (RNs) for Primary Position

      Earnings by Gender and Specialty

      The specialty with the highest median annual wage was anesthesia at $188,000. Men have higher earnings across most specializations, where women earn 85% of men’s median wage. In 2022, women earned more in the specialties of genetics, geriatrics, neonatal, nephrology, neurology, rehabilitation, and radiology (Table 37).
      Table 37Median Annual Earnings of Registered Nurses for Primary Nursing Position by Nurse Gender and Specialty, 2022
      SpecialtyMaleFemaleNonbinaryTotal
      nMdnnMdnnMdnnMdn
      Acute care/critical care349$90,0002,123$80,00010$74,0002,482$80,000
      Adult health27$90,000337$75,0002$109,000366$75,500
      Anesthesia91$220,000171$180,0001$130,000263$188,000
      Cardiology80$90,000540$75,0002$64,000622$75,500
      Community6$70,500157$67,0001$74,000164$67,500
      Emergency/trauma184$88,000991$78,0008$90,0001,183$80,000
      Family health20$117,500426$81,1501$3,500447$84,000
      Genetics4$73,00027$75,000--31$75,000
      Geriatric/gerontology57$70,000861$75,0002$90,000920$75,000
      Home health42$77,500518$73,5003$90,000563$74,000
      Informatics12$102,50092$95,500--104$96,000
      Information technology3$93,50022$89,250--25$93,500
      Maternal-child health/obstetrics4$112,500795$70,000--799$70,000
      Medical-surgical145$79,0001,376$70,0002$92,0001,524$70,000
      Neonatal6$68,500336$78,000--342$78,000
      Nephrology24$80,000234$84,000--258$82,500
      Neurology/neurosurgical18$79,000169$80,4961$54,000188$80,000
      Occupational health14$97,500163$85,000--177$86,000
      Oncology29$80,000512$77,5004$72,500545$78,000
      Orthopedic15$89,000175$72,5001$30,000191$75,000
      Palliative care/hospice22$72,250333$76,0001$85,000356$75,000
      Pediatrics30$83,500719$70,0004$82,500753$70,000
      Perioperative98$90,000985$75,0006$63,0001,089$75,000
      Primary care39$100,000443$83,0001$72,000483$85,000
      Public health27$90,000305$73,000--332$74,875
      Psychiatric/mental health/substance abuse69$95,000287$80,0001$345,000357$82,000
      Radiology4$64,00029$82,000--33$80,000
      Rehabilitation17$72,000123$77,000--140$76,500
      School health7$59,000191$54,000--198$54,500
      Urology2$82,2501267000--14$67,000
      Women’s health1$120,000125$65,0002$78,500128$65,050
      Other - clinical specialties16$92,250160$83,000--176$84,750
      Other - nonclinical specialties102$92,750899$77,0005$55,0001,006$78,000
      Total1,564$89,00014,636$76,00059$74,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Earnings by Highest Education

      As in previous surveys, the 2022 results show increases in median wages with higher-level degrees. RNs holding a DNP reported the highest earnings at $110,000 per year. RNs with a PhD reported an annual media wage of $105,000, while RNs holding a master’s or doctorate other than a DNP or PhD earned $100,000. Baccalaureate-educated RNs earned $75,000, while their associate degree in nursing (ADN) and diploma education colleagues made $70,000 per year. Overall, wages across educational attainment rose in 2022 over their 2020 earnings (Table 38).
      Table 38Median Annual Earnings of Registered Nurses for Primary Nursing Position by Nurses’ Highest Education, 2017–2022
      Highest Education201720202022
      nMdnnMdnnMdn
      Diploma1,358$72,9001,318$65,000635$70,000
      Associate degree8,303$65,0008,308$63,0004,847$70,000
      Baccalaureate degree12,714$68,00014,964$67,00010,183$75,000
      Master’s degree4,999$95,0004,617$90,0003,620$100,000
      Doctoral degree – PhD200$100,000209$93,600151$105,000
      Doctoral degree – DNP413$104,000519$100,000411$110,000
      Doctoral degree – nursing other37$96,00040$96,00043$100,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses. Regarding education, in the 2013 and 2015 surveys, a single question of “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.

      Earnings by State

      Annual median wages grew in 2022 over 2020 earnings in every state except for New Hampshire and Tennessee. As in previous surveys, the states with the highest reported median wages were California ($104,000), Hawaii ($100,000), Oregon ($91,500), New York ($90,000), and the District of Columbia ($90,000). States with the lowest annual median wages were Iowa ($68,000), Alabama ($70,000), North Dakota ($70,000), Tennessee ($70,000), and Nebraska ($70,441). In contrast to previous reports where the lowest earning state saw the largest percent increase, in 2022, the highest wage states tended to also see the largest percent increases (e.g., California at 15.6%, Oregon at 14.4%, and New York at 12.5%) while the lowest earning states saw the lowest percent increase (e.g., Alabama at 2.9%, Nebraska at 3.6%, and Tennessee at 0%) (Table 39).
      Table 39Median Annual Earnings in Primary Nursing Position by Jurisdictions Where Registered Nurses Are Currently Practicing, 2015–2022
      Jurisdiction2015201720202022
      Alabama$55,000$60,000$68,000$70,000
      Alaska$70,000$76,000$79,000$85,000
      Arizona$69,000$70,500$75,000$81,000
      Arkansas$56,000$61,605$68,000$70,765
      California$90,000$88,000$90,000$104,000
      Colorado$63,000$65,000$74,030$79,000
      Connecticut$75,000$75,000$80,000$86,500
      Delaware$71,000$71,900$75,000$80,000
      District of Columbia$75,000$79,000$80,000$90,000
      Florida$60,000$65,500$72,000$77,751
      Georgia$64,000$68,000$75,000$80,000
      Hawaii$82,000$85,000$90,000$100,000
      Idaho$60,000$62,000$70,000$73,000
      Illinois$65,000$67,000$73,169$79,000
      Indiana$53,000$64,000$69,000$75,000
      Iowa$51,662$58,000$63,000$68,000
      Kansas$54,000$64,000$65,000$73,000
      Kentucky$60,000$64,000$68,000$74,000
      Louisiana$60,000$65,000$68,000$78,000
      Maine$60,000$63,000$68,800$75,000
      Maryland$70,000$74,466$78,000$80,000
      Massachusetts$75,633$76,000$79,655$83,000
      Michigan$60,000$67,000$73,000$78,000
      Minnesota$64,870$66,000$74,000$77,000
      Mississippi$58,000$60,000$68,000$73,000
      Missouri
      Missouri did not participate in the 2015 and 2017 surveys.
      --$68,640$81,000
      Montana$58,000$60,000$66,000$74,800
      Nebraska$54,000$60,000$68,000$70,441
      Nevada$72,000$77,000$78,000$83,750
      New Hampshire$64,000$66,500$75,000$75,000
      New Jersey$76,000$75,915$80,000$88,000
      New Mexico$62,000$69,500$73,000$81,125
      New York$77,000$80,000$80,000$90,000
      North Carolina$58,890$61,000$69,000$78,316
      North Dakota$54,000$60,000$65,000$70,000
      Ohio$58,000$65,000$70,000$74,000
      Oklahoma$58,326$64,000$70,000$75,000
      Oregon$75,000$80,000$80,000$91,500
      Pennsylvania$62,000$70,000$75,000$81,000
      Rhode Island$70,000$70,000$77,400$82,000
      South Carolina$57,000$64,000$69,609$78,000
      South Dakota$51,000$54,000$62,000$71,025
      Tennessee$55,000$62,000$70,000$70,000
      Texas$68,700$72,000$75,000$80,000
      Utah$53,000$65,000$68,000$73,000
      Vermont$62,000$61,000$73,492$76,000
      Virginia$60,000$69,000$75,000$79,000
      Washington$70,000$75,000$80,000$86,000
      West Virginia$55,000$62,000$68,000$72,000
      Wisconsin$60,000$63,000$70,500$75,000
      Wyoming$64,000$65,000$70,000$81,000
      Northern Mariana Islands$35,000$41,600$60,000$64,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.
      A Missouri did not participate in the 2015 and 2017 surveys.

      Earnings by Years Licensed and Age

      Median annual earnings tended to increase with both age and experience. However, an examination of Table 40 suggests these increases are more dependent on experience than on age. Earnings grow consistently with experience, while growth with age varies and begins to decrease after the age of 60years (Table 40).
      Table 40Median Annual Earnings of Registered Nurses for Primary Nursing Position by Nurses’ Years Licensed and Age, 2022
      Age, yNumber of Years Licensed
      0–12–56–10≥11Total
      nMdnnMdnnMdnnMdnnMdn
      18–29362$57,0001,137$65,000301$70,0003$90,0001,803$64,000
      30–34118$60,000603$66,0001,098$71,000263$75,0002,082$70,000
      35–3966$58,350355$70,000596$75,0001,194$80,0002,211$75,000
      40–4451$62,000225$70,000446$78,0001,353$81,0002,075$80,000
      45–4939$60,000151$70,000263$78,0001,459$85,0001,912$80,626
      50–5422$59,00097$72,000203$78,0001,731$88,0002,053$85,000
      55–599$60,00058$76,500135$84,0001,914$87,3412,116$86,000
      60–642$77,50022$79,00074$77,3622,201$84,0002,299$84,000
      ≥657$65,00019$63,00033$69,0001,906$79,5001,965$70,000
      Total676$60,0002,667$68,0003,149$75,00012,024$82,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Earnings by APRNs

      CRNAs continue to report the highest earnings among APRNs (Mdn, $197,500 in 2022), with NPs reporting the second highest wages (Mdn, $108,000 in 2022). While earnings grew in each APRN role in 2022, earnings for CNMs and CNSs grew the fastest in 2022 at 18.3% and 11.3%, respectively (Table 41).
      Table 41Median Annual Earnings for Primary Nursing Position by APRN Role, 2017–2022
      APRN role201720202022
      nMdnnMdnnMdn
      CNP2,982$100,0001,958$100,0001,755$108,000
      CNS644$88,000448$80,000399$89,000
      CRNA557$171,000341$180,000244$197,500
      CNM186$97,750116$86,00074$101,739
      Note. APRN = advanced practice registered nurse; CNP = certified nurse practitioner; CNS = clinical nurse specialist; CRNA = certified registered nurse anesthetist; CNM = certified nurse midwife. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Telehealth Utilization

      Percentage of Time Providing Telehealth

      Telehealth utilization by RNs remains relatively unchanged from previous years, with about half of RNs (49.9%) not providing services via telehealth. However, the proportion of nurses who reported utilizing telehealth all of the time rose to 11.8%, an increase of 1.8% from the 2020 survey. It remains likely that the increase in telehealth utilization is only among advanced practice degrees and those practicing in ambulatory and primary care settings (Table 42 and Figure 17).
      Table 42Percentage of Time Registered Nurses (RNs) Reported Providing Telehealth, 2015–2022
      Provides Telehealth2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 37,354.6N = 39,441.6N = 33,582.4N = 203,074.2
      Never19,119.151.218,095.145.917,460.252.0101,365.649.9
      1%–25%11,710.731.412,490.631.78,960.826.752,667.125.9
      26%–50%2,560.56.92,851.27.22,184.96.517,701.38.7
      51%–75%1,785.34.82,201.65.61,634.54.97,307.63.6
      76%–100%2,179.15.83,803.29.63,341.910.024,032.611.8
      U.S. RN Population
      Never1,533,81151.21,467,92045.91,744,32952.01,617,31749.9
      1%–25%803,54931.41,013,26831.7895,21226.7840,31925.9
      26%–50%175,6916.9231,2947.2218,2786.5282,4298.7
      51%–75%122,5024.8178,6025.6163,2924.9116,5953.6
      76%–100%149,5195.8308,5299.6333,86610.0383,44611.8
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 17
      Figure 17Percentage of Time Registered Nurses (RNs) Report Providing Telehealth

      Telehealth Across State Borders

      As with the provisioning of services via telehealth in general (Table 42), more than half (54.7%) of RNs do not utilize telehealth to provide services to patients across state lines. Thirty-one percent of RNs report spending between 1% and 25% of their time providing services to patients in other states through telehealth. Utilization of services across state borders through telehealth is similar to utilization reported in 2020 (Table 43 and Figure 18).
      Table 43Percentage of Time Registered Nurses Spend Providing Telehealth Across State Borders, 2015–2022
      Provides Telehealth2015 (N = 18,456.1)2017 (N = 17,573.3)2020 (N = 13,965.3)2022 (N = 77,135.0)
      n%n%n%n%
      Never11,186.760.69,535.054.37,395.653.042,175.654.7
      1%–25%5,843.231.76,294.535.84,663.633.423,898.131.0
      26%–50%626.83.4692.23.9678.04.94,913.76.4
      51%–75%298.51.6414.02.4366.92.61,352.01.8
      76%–100%500.92.7637.63.6861.26.24,795.66.2
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 18
      Figure 18Percentage of Time Registered Nurses (RNs) Spend Providing Telehealth Across State Borders

      Telehealth Across International Borders

      Less than 10% of RNs in the United States provide services via telehealth across international borders. This rate has changed little from previous surveys (Table 44 and Figure 19).
      Table 44Percentage of Time Registered Nurses Spend Providing Telehealth Across International Borders, 2015–2022
      Provides Telehealth2015 (N = 18,096.1)2017 (N = 16,369.8)2020 (N = 13,208.2)2022 (N = 64,434.9)
      n%n%n%n%
      Never16,707.292.314,548.688.912,087.291.558,397.190.6
      1%–25%1,194.76.61,488.29.1965.97.34,681.27.3
      26%–50%96.30.5129.40.874.00.6616.41.0
      51%–75%33.70.2103.70.632.90.3278.10.4
      76%–100%64.30.499.80.648.30.4462.20.7
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 19
      Figure 19Percentage of Time Registered Nurses (RNs) Spend Providing Telehealth Across National Boarders

      Modes of Communication Used for Telehealth

      As seen in previous years, the use of the telephone is the most common mode (88.0%) of communication for telehealth provision. The use of video calls was the second most common mode (35.4%) and has increased markedly in use since 2020 (11.0%). Email was the third most common mode at 33.4% and was relatively unchanged since 2020. The use of electronic messaging was used in 32.7% of telehealth service provision and had increased by 8.2% since 2020 (Table 45 and Figure 20).
      Table 45Modes of Communication Used for Telehealth by Registered Nurses, 2015–2022
      Mode of Telehealth2015 (N = 15,864.1)2017 (N = 17,066.0)2020 (N = 13,775.4)2022 (N = 83,950.6)
      n%n%n%n%
      Electronic messaging2,954.018.63,599.621.13,379.324.527,458.132.7
      VoIP528.73.3817.34.811,297.78.70.00.0
      Virtual ICU167.71.1276.91.6316.32.33,046.73.6
      Telephone15,406.797.116,143.994.612,893.393.673,855.088.0
      Email5,128.232.35,574.432.74,497.932.728,028.333.4
      Video call463.72.9619.83.61,517.111.029,677.635.4
      Other1,070.96.8926.45.4753.55.55,561.96.6
      Note. VoIP = voice over internet protocol; ICU = intensive care unit.
      Figure 20
      Figure 20Modes of Communication Used by Registered Nurses (RNs) for Telehealth

      Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

      Impact on Employment

      The coronavirus pandemic affected RNs mostly through its impact on their workload. More than 60% of RNs reported an increase in their workload due to the pandemic. The next most-reported impact was a change in practice setting (16%). About 12% of RNs reported that the pandemic had no impact on their employment (Table 46).
      Table 46Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Registered Nurse (RN) Employment, 2022
      Impact2022
      n%
      RN Survey RespondentsN = 250,709.3
      My workload increased154,905.661.8
      I became a travel nurse13,434.55.4
      I changed my practice setting39,109.815.6
      I started doing telehealth15,268.16.1
      I left nursing6,719.72.7
      I retired15,035.56.0
      No impact31,184.712.4
      Other43,185.817.2
      U.S. RN Population
      My workload increased2,471,56261.8
      I became a travel nurse214,3515.4
      I changed my practice setting624,00715.6
      I started doing telehealth243,6066.1
      I left nursing107,2152.7
      I retired239,8956.0
      No impact497,56112.4
      Other689,04217.2
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Are You Emotionally Drained?

      About a quarter (24%) of RNs reported they were emotionally drained from work every day and another 27% reported they were emotionally drained a few times a week. Thus, more than half of RNs reported they were emotionally drained from work at least few times every week. Only 5% reported never feeling emotionally drained from work (Table 47).
      Table 47Registered Nurses Who Reported Feeling Emotionally Drained From Work, 2022
      Felt Emotionally Drained2022 (N = 239,525.5)
      n%
      Never11,997.65.0
      A few times a year22,007.69.2
      Once a month or less18,481.97.7
      A few times a month37,914.315.8
      Once a week27,374.711.4
      A few times a week64,472.926.9
      Every day57,276.623.9
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Used Up?

      Two-thirds of RNs reported feeling used up at the end of their workday at least one day a week. Only 5.6% reported never feeling used up at the end of their workday (Table 48).
      Table 48Registered Nurses Who Reported Feeling Used Up at the End of Their Workday, 2022
      Felt Used Up2022 (N = 238,535.4)
      n%
      Never13,423.15.6
      A few times a year17,208.97.2
      Once a month or less15,702.66.6
      A few times a month30,373.212.7
      Once a week26,609.111.2
      A few times a week62,924.526.4
      Every day72,293.930.3
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Fatigued When You Get Up?

      More than a quarter (26.3%) of RNs reported feeling fatigued when they get up and have to face another day on the job every day. Another 23.3% reported feeling fatigued when they get up and have to face another day on the job a few times a week. Only 8.2% reported never feeling fatigued when they get up and must face another day on the job (Table 49).
      Table 49Registered Nurses Who Reported Feeling Fatigued When They Get Up, 2022
      Felt Fatigue2022 (N = 238,780.7)
      n%
      Never19,594.78.2
      A few times a year21,548.79.0
      Once a month or less19,788.08.3
      A few times a month31,919.513.4
      Once a week27,482.011.5
      A few times a week55,652.923.3
      Every day62,795.026.3
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Burned-Out From Work?

      A quarter (25.8%) of RNs reported feeling burned-out from work every day and 19.4% also reported feeling burned-out a few times a week. About 11% reported never feeling burned-out from work (Table 50).
      Table 50Registered Nurses Who Reported Feeling Burned-Out From Work, 2022
      Felt Burned-Out2022 (N = 238,420.3)
      n%
      Never26,003.510.9
      A few times a year29,406.412.3
      Once a month or less21,739.69.1
      A few times a month30,730.112.9
      Once a week22,876.19.6
      A few times a week46,233.619.4
      Every day61,431.025.8
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Did You Feel You Were at the End of Your Rope?

      About 28% of RNs reported they felt they were at the end of their rope at least a few times per week, with half of this group feeling like that every day. About 9.2% felt they were at the end of their rope once per week. Slightly over a quarter never felt like they were at the end of their rope (Table 51).
      Table 51Registered Nurses Who Reported Feeling at the End of Their Rope, 2022
      Felt at End of Rope2022 (N = 238,187.0)
      n%
      Never66,571.228.0
      A few times a year31,951.313.4
      Once a month or less21,266.78.9
      A few times a month26,454.611.1
      Once a week21,834.09.2
      A few times a week35,017.114.7
      Every day35,092.114.7
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Licensed Practical Nurse/Licensed Vocational Nurse Results

      Demographics

      Gender

      Respondents were asked to identify their gender. From 2015 through 2022, the percentage of male LPNs/LVNs nurses increased from 7.5% to 10.2% while the percentage of female nurses decreased from 92.5% to 89.6% (Table 52).
      Table 52Gender Distribution of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Gender2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 28,891.0N = 34,616.8N = 39,530.0N = 54,380.7
      Male2,169.77.52,670.97.73,195.88.15,563.210.2
      Female26,721.392.531,945.992.336,303.191.848,712.389.6
      Nonbinary
      “Other” was added as a response option with the 2020 survey and was renamed “nonbinary” in 2022.
      ----31.10.1105.20.2
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Male65,2467.561,0647.775,9328.192,60410.2
      Female803,55992.5730,38392.3862,55991.8810,86189.6
      Nonbinary
      “Other” was added as a response option with the 2020 survey and was renamed “nonbinary” in 2022.
      ----7390.11,7510.2
      Note. Frequencies reflect nonresponse weighting adjustments.
      a “Other” was added as a response option with the 2020 survey and was renamed “nonbinary” in 2022.

      Age

      The median age for LPNs/LVNs in 2022 was 47years. In 2015, the largest proportion of LPNs/LVNs were aged 55–59 years (12.9%). In 2017 and 2020, the largest proportion of LPNs/LVNs were aged 65 years or older (13.2% and 18.2%, respectively). In 2022, the largest proportion of LPNs/LVNs were aged 50–54 years (15.0%), but every younger age group increased in 2022 compared with 2020. While older LPNs/LVNs are remaining in the workforce, the profession is making headway in increasing the proportion of younger nurses in the profession (Table 53).
      Figure 21
      Figure 21Age Distribution of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)
      Table 53Age Distribution of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Age, y2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 27,172.4N = 34,454.1N = 37,868.7N = 51,883.5
      17–292,652.59.83,072.78.92,816.17.44,955.19.6
      30–342,579.59.52,930.18.53,163.88.45,783.911.2
      35–392,689.39.93,541.210.33,710.19.85,485.810.6
      40–443,331.812.33,539.410.33,885.010.36,280.012.1
      45–493,375.112.44,052.611.84,253.511.26,205.312.0
      50–543,076.411.33,875.011.24,056.510.77,787.315.0
      55–593,516.312.94,428.012.94,305.611.45,073.69.8
      60–643,264.912.04,476.913.04,770.812.64,177.88.1
      ≥652,686.69.94,538.313.26,907.318.26,134.511.8
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      17–2979,7649.870,2518.966,9107.482,4829.6
      30–3477,5699.566,9918.575,1728.496,27911.2
      35–3980,8739.980,96210.388,1529.891,31610.6
      40–44100,19412.380,92110.392,30710.3104,53712.1
      45–49101,49512.492,65411.8101,06311.2103,29312.0
      50–5492,51311.388,59511.296,38210.7129,62615.0
      55–59105,74212.9101,23912.9102,30111.484,4559.8
      60–6498,18212.0102,35613.0113,35412.669,5448.1
      ≥6580,7919.9103,75913.2164,11718.2102,11511.8

      Age by Gender

      The distribution of female LPNs/LVNs was relatively flat across all age cohorts. Interestingly, the largest cohort of female nurses was the oldest age group (≥65 years) at 12.1%. This was markedly different than the male and nonbinary genders where the age distribution is skewed towards younger age groups (Table 53).
      Table 53Age Distribution of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses by Gender, 2022
      Age, yMale (n = 5,292.8)Female (n = 46,312.8)Nonbinary (n = 96.7)Total (N = 51,702.3)
      n%n%n%n%
      17–29665.612.64,233.19.141.042.44,939.79.6%
      30–34663.412.55,086.711.014.314.85,764.311.1%
      35–39437.58.35,025.310.98.89.15,471.710.6%
      40–44704.913.35,555.512.05.96.16,266.312.1%
      45–49638.012.15,535.912.02.42.46,176.311.9%
      50–54803.115.26,943.215.016.116.77,762.415.0%
      55–59512.19.74,537.59.81.01.05,050.59.8%
      60–64374.97.13,785.58.22.22.34,162.68.1%
      ≥65493.39.35,610.012.15.15.36,108.411.8%

      Race/Ethnicity

      From 2017 to 2022, the proportion of White/Caucasian LPNs/LVNs decreased from 71.4% to 65.9%, while the proportion of Asian LPNs/LVNs increased from 2.6% to 6.3%. The proportion of LPNs/LVNs in the other racial categories remained largely unchanged between 2017 and 2022 (Table 54).
      Table 54Race/Ethnicity of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2017–2022
      Race201720202022
      n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 34,467.5N = 39,397.4N = 53,913.0
      American Indian or Alaska Native219.80.6316.60.8673.11.3
      Asian897.42.61,980.65.03,415.16.3
      Black/African American6,372.418.56,790.717.29,482.517.6
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander62.40.2225.20.6309.30.6
      White/Caucasian24,604.071.427,385.169.535,527.265.9
      Other1,568.54.61,743.94.42,915.65.4
      More than one race category selected743.12.2921.62.31,590.23.0
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      American Indian or Alaska Native5,0240.67,5220.811,2051.3
      Asian20,5172.647,0595.056,8486.3
      Black/African American145,69218.5161,34617.2157,84417.6
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1,4270.25,3510.65,1490.6
      White/Caucasian562,52471.4650,66869.5591,38265.9
      Other35,8604.641,4354.448,5335.4
      More than one race category selected16,9902.221,8972.326,4713.0
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. Responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Hispanic/Latino Ethnicity

      In 2022, 11.5% of LPNs/LVNs identified as being of Hispanic/Latino origin. Between 2015 and 2022, the percentage of RNs identifying as Hispanic/Latino increased from 6.4% to 11.5% (Table 55 and Figure 22).
      Table 55Hispanic or Latino Ethnicity of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Ethnicity2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 30,620.8N = 34,449.3N = 39,335.6N = 53,914.9
      Hispanic or Latino origin1,964.66.42,558.67.43,912.810.06,219.111.5
      Not of Hispanic or Latino origin28,656.393.631,890.692.635,422.990.047,695.888.5
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Hispanic or Latino origin59,0796.458,4987.492,96810.0103,52211.5
      Not of Hispanic or Latino origin861,74693.6729,11992.6841,64590.0793,94088.5
      Note. In the 2013 and 2015 surveys, the Hispanic/Latino origin and race categories were combined into one question. The categories were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.
      Figure 22
      Figure 22Hispanic or Latino Origin for Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Race/Ethnicity by Gender

      Male LPNs/LVNs tend to be more racially diverse than their female colleagues. Only 47.5% of male LPNs/LVNs identified as being White/Caucasian compared to 68.1% for female LPNs/LVNs. Also, 20.9% of male LPNs/LVNs identified as Black/African American and 14.9% identified as Asian, while female LPNs/LVNs were 17.2% and 5.4%, respectively (Table 56).
      Table 56Race of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses by Gender, 2022
      RaceMale (n = 5,526.9)Female (n = 48,091.0)Nonbinary (n = 105.2)Total (N = 53,723.1)
      n%n%n%n%
      American Indian or Alaska Native147.72.7509.81.19.18.7666.71.2
      Asian822.314.92,572.15.44.13.93,398.56.3
      Black/African1,154.820.98,275.317.24.94.79,435.017.6
      Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander89.11.6212.90.40.00.0302.00.6
      White/Caucasian2,626.347.532,739.168.169.966.535,435.366.0
      Other389.27.02,498.65.212.511.92,900.35.4
      More than one race category selected297.55.41,283.22.74.74.41,585.43.0
      Note. Weighted sample values. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. The responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Race by Age

      Like the results seen for RNs, younger LPNs/LVNs tend to be more racially diverse than older nurses. However, the youngest cohort (age 17–29 years) are less diverse than those in slightly older cohorts. LPNs/LVNs between the ages of 30 and 54 years were the most diverse of all age groups (Table 57).
      Table 57Race of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses by Age, 2022
      Age, yn (%)
      American Indian or Alaska NativeAsianBlack/African

      American
      Native Hawaiian or other Pacific IslanderWhite/CaucasianOtherMore than

      one race
      n
      17–29135.6 (2.8)218.4 (4.5)538.4 (11.0)48.0 (1.0)3,509.7 (71.8)263.8 (5.4)176.5 (3.6)4,890.4
      30–3472.0 (1.3)526.2 (9.2)789.7 (13.8)49.5 (0.9)3,596.3 (62.9)431.3 (7.5)254.2 (4.5)5,719.2
      35–3975.2 (1.4)448.2 (8.3)1,090.8 (20.1)46.6 (0.9)3,221.6 (59.4)360.3 (6.6)185.5 (3.4)5,428.2
      40–4467.9 (1.1)458.2 (7.4)1,335.7 (21.5)59.8 (1.0)3,700.1 (59.6)322.3 (5.2)259.5 (4.2)6,203.6
      45–4954.1 (0.9)393.8 (6.4)1,364.2 (22.1)46.0 (0.8)3,781.2 (61.4)305.0 (5.0)217.6 (3.5)6,162.0
      50–54110.9 (1.4)576.2 (7.5)1,574.8 (20.4)25.7 (0.3)4,855.5 (62.9)408.6 (5.3)169.1 (2.2)7,720.8
      55–5956.0 (1.1)246.3 (4.9)750.0 (14.9)14.9 (0.3)3,550.1 (70.7)289.9 (5.8)113.8 (2.3)5,021.0
      60–6429.4 (0.7)163.1 (3.9)591.6 (14.3)9.4 (0.2)3,120.0 (75.5)154.0 (3.7)66.8 (1.6)4,134.4
      ≥ 6547.0 (0.8)156.6 (2.6)876.9 (14.4)6.8 (0.1)4,719.0 (77.7)178.4 (2.9)86.0 (1.4)6,070.6
      Total648.1 (1.3)3,187.1 (6.2)8,912.1 (17.4)306.7 (0.6)34,053.5 (66.3)2,713.6 (5.3)1,529.2 (3.0)51,350.2
      Note. Weighted sample values. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. The responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Education

      Type of Nursing Degree or Credentials for First U.S. Nursing License

      In 2022, 82.0% of LPNs/LVNs held a vocational/practical certificate when they were first licensed in the United States. This rate is mostly unchanged from 2015 to 2022. A little more than 10% held a nursing diploma when first licensed, while 8.0% held either a baccalaureate or associate degree (Table 58 and Figure 23).
      Table 58Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) for First U.S. Nursing License, 2015–2022
      Nursing Degree or Credential2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 30,223.3N = 34,108.8N = 38,868.2N = 52,916.2
      Vocational/practical certificate25,257.483.628,395.083.231,665.681.543,388.882.0
      Diploma3,661.312.14,098.612.03,914.410.15,317.010.1
      Associate degree1,168.83.91,521.34.52,793.37.23,423.76.5
      Baccalaureate degree135.80.493.90.3495.01.3786.71.5
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Vocational/practical certificate759,53783.6649,19783.2752,37181.5722,2460.0
      Diploma110,10112.193,70712.093,00610.188,5070.0
      Associate degree35,1463.934,7824.566,3687.256,9900.0
      Baccalaureate degree4,0850.42,1460.311,7601.313,0950.0
      Figure 23
      Figure 23Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) for First U.S. Nursing License

      Type of Nursing Degree or Credential for First U.S. Nursing License by Age

      Across all age groups, the vocational/practical certificate was the most commonly held credential when respondents obtained their first U.S. LPN/LVN license. The second most-held credential was the nursing diploma, and it was more common among LPNs/LVNs between the ages of 40 and 54 years (Table 59).
      Table 59Type of Nursing Degree or Credential of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses for First U.S. Nursing License by Age, 2022
      Age, yNursing degree or credential, n (%)Total (N = 50,408.3)
      Vocational/practical certificate (n = 41,243.7)Diploma (n = 5,106.1)Associate degree (n = 3,283.4)Baccalaureate degree (n = 747.5)Master’s degree (n = 27.6)
      17–294,108.0 (10.0)363.2 (7.1)368.3 (11.2)40.8 (5.5)0.0 (0.0)4,880.3 (9.7)
      30–344,608.7 (11.2)454.1 (8.9)384.9 (11.7)200.6 (26.8)0.1 (0.4)5,648.4 (11.2)
      35–394,428.8 (10.7)483.1 (9.5)379.8 (11.6)90.3 (12.1)3.9 (14.1)5,385.9 (10.7)
      40–444,792.8 (11.6)730.4 (14.3)504.6 (15.4)87.8 (11.7)0.2 (0.6)6,115.7 (12.1)
      45–494,837.8 (11.7)737.6 (14.5)430.0 (13.1)64.4 (8.6)0.0 (0.0)6,069.8 (12.0)
      50–545,977.9 (14.5)877.5 (17.2)460.1 (14.0)161.0 (21.5)10.9 (39.7)7,487.5 (14.9)
      55–593,965.5 (9.6)531.8 (10.4)317.1 (9.7)51.8 (6.9)0.2 (0.6)4,866.4 (9.7)
      60–643,388.0 (8.2)412.5 (8.1)218.3 (6.7)28.3 (3.8)4.1 (14.9)4,051.3 (8.0)
      ≥655,136.3 (12.5)515.9 (10.1)220.1 (6.7)22.5 (3.0)8.2 (29.8)5,903.1 (11.7)
      Note. Weighted sample values.

      Highest Level of Nursing Education

      In 2022, 71.8% of LPNs/LVNs’ highest level of nursing education was a vocational/practical certificate. Additionally, 12.2% of LPNs/LVNs held a diploma, 13.1% were awarded an associate degree, and 2.9% held a baccalaureate degree (Table 60 and Figure 24).
      Table 60Highest Level of Nursing Education Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2015–2022
      2015 (N = 25,626.5)2017 (N = 34,208.6)2020 (N = 38,746.1)2022 (N = 49.455.0)
      Nursing Degree or Credentialn%n%n%n%
      Vocational/practical certificate19,481.376.026,615.377.827,899.972.035,510.071.8
      Diploma3,882.515.24,900.814.34,732.512.26,051.612.2
      Associate degree1,888.67.42,509.67.34,910.112.76,473.313.1
      Baccalaureate degree308.51.2182.80.51,203.53.11,420.12.9
      Note. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey. A very small number (<0.1%) of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses earned a master’s degree.
      Figure 24
      Figure 24Highest Level of Nursing Education Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs

      Highest Level of Nursing Education by Race

      The vocational/practical certificate was the most common highest level of education across all racial groups. For LPNs/LVNs identifying as Asian, 59.0% held a vocational/practical certification, 7.0% had an associate degree, and 24.0% held a baccalaureate. Overall, only 2.9% of the LPN/LVN workforce held a baccalaureate degree and 13.1% held an associate degree (Table 61).
      Table 61Highest Level of Nursing Education of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses by Race, 2020
      Racen (%)n
      Vocational/CertificateDiplomaAssociateBaccalaureate
      American Indian or Alaska Native440.6 (71.2)56.1 (9.1)77.9 (12.6)44.6 (7.2)619.2
      Asian1,886.8 (59.0)224.5 (7.0)319.6 (10.0)766.6 (24.0)3,198.2
      Black/African American5,438.6 (64.6)1,576.9 (18.7)1,236.8 (14.7)169.5 (2.0)8,421.8
      Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander246.5 (83.9)8.9 (3.0)29.5 (10.1)8.7 (3.0)293.7
      White/Caucasian24,335.6 (75.7)3,600.8 (11.2)3,946.6 (12.3)252.1 (0.8)32,136.5
      Other1,819.2 (66.6)308.5 (11.3)536.0 (19.6)66.5 (2.4)2,730.2
      More than one race category selected871.3 (61.0)215.2 (15.1)246.0 (17.2)97.0 (6.8)1,429.5
      Total35,038.5 (71.8)5,991.0 (12.3)6,392.3 (13.1)1,405.0 (2.9)48,829.2
      Note. Weighted sample values. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey. For the race question, respondents were asked to select all that apply. The responses were subsequently recoded to ensure that the race categories were mutually exclusive. Respondents selecting multiple race categories were reclassified into the “more than one race category selected” category.

      Highest Level of Non-nursing Education

      When asked about their highest level of non-nursing education, 69.2% of LPNs/LVNs reported an associate degree non-nursing education. While 25.0% held a baccalaureate degree, 4.8% held a master’s degree, and 1.1% obtained a doctorate (Table 62).
      Table 62Highest Level of Non-nursing Education of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2017–2022
      Degree2017 (N = 9,832.6)2020 (N = 12,497.8)2022 (N = 18,469.8)
      n%n%n%
      Associate degree6,762.068.88,719.769.812,786.669.2
      Baccalaureate degree2,460.125.03,008.124.14,612.725.0
      Master’s degree515.65.2674.05.4877.04.8
      Doctoral degree95.01.095.90.8193.51.1
      Note. In the 2015 surveys, a single question “What is your highest level of education?” was asked with the set of possible responses including both nursing and non-nursing degrees. The degree types were separated beginning with the 2017 survey.

      Licensure

      Number of Years Licensed

      In 2022, LPN/LVN respondents reported they were licensed for a median of 13years, as compared to 17years in the 2020 survey. More than four of every 10 respondents (42.1%) were licensed for 10years or less, a 5.2% increase from the 36.9% reporting the same in 2020. An additional 27.3% were licensed between 11 and 20years, which also increased from 23.4% in 2020. Nearly 70% reported they have been licensed for 20years or less, the highest percentage since 2015 (Table 63).
      Figure 25
      Figure 25Number of Years Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Have Been Licensed
      Table 63Number of Years Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Have Been Licensed, 2015–2022
      Years Licensed2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 26,138.0N = 33,652.6N = 36,311.8N = 50,033.44
      0–1011,417.843.713,694.140.713,401.436.921,074.242.1
      11–205,258.920.16,674.019.88,502.223.413,658.127.3
      21–304,018.015.45,483.916.36,028.316.67,578.415.2
      31–403,552.013.64,531.913.54,213.211.64,229.08.5
      ≥411,891.47.23,268.69.74,166.711.53,493.87.0
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      0–10343,35343.7313,09040.7318,41636.9350,79842.1
      11–20158,14520.1152,58919.8202,01223.4227,35227.3
      21–30120,82815.4125,37916.3143,23216.6126,14915.2
      31–40106,81513.6103,61413.5100,10511.670,3958.5
      ≥4156,8777.274,7309.799,00011.558,1577.0

      Initially Licensed in the United States

      Almost 99% of LPN/LVN respondents were initially licensed in the United States, the same proportion as in 2020. Another 0.7% were initially licensed in the Philippines, 0.1% in Canada, and 0.1% in India. These results are nearly identical to the results in 2020 (Table 64).
      Table 64Country in Which Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Were Initially Licensed, 2020–2022
      Country20202022
      n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 39,472.5N = 54,920.8
      United States38,959.198.754,218.698.7
      Canada48.20.155.60.1
      Philippines237.90.6397.60.7
      India28.90.129.60.1
      Other198.40.5219.50.4
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      United States925,66598.7902,51898.7
      Canada1,1450.19250.1
      Philippines5,6520.66,6180.7
      India6870.14920.1
      Other4,7140.53,6540.4

      Multistate License

      In 2022, 28.7% of LPN/LVNs reported having a multistate license. This represents a 7.5% increase in the possession of a multistate license by LPN/LVNs since 2020 (Table 65).
      Table 65Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Holding a Multistate License, 2020–2022
      Multistate license2020 (N = 32,235.9)2022 (N = 42,649.7)
      n%n%
      Yes6,847.521.212,223.928.7
      No25,388.378.830,425.871.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Use of Multistate License

      In 2022, a new question was added to the survey to inquire about the use of the multistate license among LPNs/LVNs. About three quarters of respondents (76.6%) reported not using their multistate license. For LPNs/LVNs who have a multistate license, 4.4% used it for telehealth, 2.4% used it for disaster support, 1.0% for distance education, and 17.6% used their multistate license for another purpose (Table 66). Additional uses were for travel nursing and multistate practice.
      Table 66How Multistate License is Used by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2022
      Use of Multistate License

      2022 (N = 12,135.0)
      n%
      Telehealth531.04.4
      Distance education115.21.0
      Disaster support293.12.4
      Have not used9,296.376.6
      Other2,134.617.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing and had a multistate license. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Employment

      Employment Status

      The major portion of responding LPNs/LVNs (87.7%) were actively employed in nursing, with 71.0% employed in nursing full time. This represents a 5.3% increase in the proportion of LPNs/LVNs actively employed and a 5.3% increase in those working full time from 2020 (65.7%). In 2022, the proportion of LPNs/LVNs who were actively employed in nursing was at the highest level since 2015 (Table 67).
      Figure 26
      Figure 26Employment Status of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)
      Table 67Employment Status of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Employment Status2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 30,766.0N = 34,570.2N = 39,579.6N = 54,901.4
      Actively employed in nursing full-time18,823.461.222,476.565.026,020.565.738,963.471.0
      Actively employed in nursing part-time3,714.012.14,151.912.04,275.910.85,633.010.3
      Actively employed in nursing per diem2,179.47.12,227.56.42,326.05.93,567.46.5
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing full-time1,504.34.91,306.63.81,257.83.21,769.13.2
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing part-time868.52.8756.72.2600.91.5938.71.7
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing per diem386.71.3193.60.6230.50.6331.10.6
      Working in nursing only as a volunteer366.11.2408.91.2383.61.0455.60.8
      Unemployed, seeking work as a nurse1,558.75.11,162.03.41,260.93.21,625.43.0
      Unemployed, not seeking work as a nurse1,588.95.21,595.04.61,614.74.12,203.04.0
      Retired2,927.19.52,991.28.74,457.711.33,798.76.9
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Actively employed in nursing full-time566,05361.2513,88465.0618,24565.7648,58171.0
      Actively employed in nursing part-time111,68612.194,92512.0101,59510.893,76610.3
      Actively employed in nursing per diem65,5407.150,9286.455,2665.959,3836.5
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing full-time45,2364.929,8743.829,8853.229,4483.2
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing part-time26,1162.817,3012.214,2771.515,6251.7
      Actively employed in a field other than nursing per diem11,6291.34,4270.65,4770.65,5110.6
      Working in nursing only as a volunteer11,0081.29,3501.29,1141.07,5830.8
      Unemployed, seeking work as a nurse46,8735.126,5663.429,9593.227,0563.0
      Unemployed, not seeking work as a nurse47,7825.236,4674.638,3654.136,6704.0
      Retired88,0249.568,3878.7105,91511.363,2326.9
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply.

      Reasons for Being Unemployed

      Respondents were asked to select all the reasons for being unemployed. Taking care of home and family was the most frequently selected reason for being unemployed (41.9%). Other respondents cited the COVID-19 pandemic (20.2%), school (14.2%), and disability (13.0%) as reasons for being unemployed. Almost 11% of LPNs/LVNs stated they were unemployed due to inadequate salary. This represents a marked increase in the reporting of an inadequate salary as the reason for being unemployed (4.8% in 2020 was 4.8% and between 3.0% in 2015 to 4.1% in 2017). The percentage of LPNs/LVNs who indicated unemployment because they experienced difficulty in finding a nursing position was 8.9% in 2022, which was down from 13.8% in 2020 (Table 68 and Figure 27).
      Table 68Reasons for Unemployment Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2015–2022
      Reasons for Unemployment2015 (N = 2,644.5)2017 (N = 2,696.8)2020 (N = 2,781.4)2022 (N = 3,672.8)
      n%n%n%n%
      Taking care of home and family1,033.039.11,117.441.41,203.243.31,537.941.9
      Disabled463.317.5570.021.1470.516.9478.713.0
      Inadequate salary77.93.0111.54.1133.74.8401.810.9
      School393.914.9288.410.7336.512.1521.214.2
      Difficulty in finding a nursing position610.423.1419.615.6384.513.8325.68.9
      COVID-19 pandemic------658.420.2
      Other600.122.7713.026.4812.329.21,309.735.7
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were unemployed. Respondents were asked to select all that apply.
      Figure 27
      Figure 27Reasons for Unemployment Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Retirement Plans

      When asked about their plans to retire in the next 5 years, a quarter (25.6%) of LPNs/LVNs reported they plan to retire within the next 5 years. This finding represents a 5.4% increase over the proportion who thought they would retire within 5years (20.2%) in the 2020 survey. This question was new in the 2020 survey (Table 69).
      Table 69Retirement Plans of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2020–2022
      Plan to Retire Within 5Years20202022
      n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 31,693.0N = 43,129.4
      Yes6,406.820.211,041.425.6
      No25,286.279.832,087.974.4
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Yes152,22520.2183,79525.6
      No600,79879.8534,13374.4
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Number of Positions Currently Held

      Respondents were asked to identify the number of positions in which they were currently employed as a nurse. The majority of LPNs/LVNs (79.2%) reported holding just one position as a nurse, which represents a 3.2% decrease compared to 2020. The percentage of LPNs/LVNs who reported working in two positions increased from 15.1% in 2020 to 17.4% in 2022. The percentage of respondents who indicated that they held three or more positions in nursing also increased from 2.5% in 2020 to 3.5% in 2022 (Table 70).
      Table 70Number of Positions Currently Held by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Number of Positions2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 23,317.3N = 27,576.8N = 31,231.7N = 45,431.9
      119,706.584.522,725.082.425,738.982.435,983.479.2
      23,113.013.44,117.514.94,705.715.17,882.717.4
      ≥3497.82.1734.32.7787.12.51,565.83.5
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      1592,61184.5519,56382.4611,55482.4598,97779.2
      293,61313.494,13914.9111,80715.1131,21417.4
      ≥314,9702.116,7882.718,7012.526,0643.5
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.

      Number of Hours Worked During a Typical Week in All Nursing Positions

      A little more than half (50.8%) of responding LPNs/LVNs reported working 32 to 40hours in a typical week in all positions. This is lower than the results from the 2020 survey (58.6%) and the 2017 survey (59.4%). The second most frequently reported category was 41 to 50hours (20.6%). This represents an increase from 2020 (14.9%) and 2017 (16.0%) (Table 71 and Figure 28).
      Table 71Number of Hours Worked by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) During a Typical Week in All Nursing Positions, 2015–2022
      Hours Worked per Week2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 22,450.6N = 27,505.7N = 30,985.7N = 45,095.9
      1–15913.14.11,132.64.11,214.43.91,527.33.4
      16–231,088.94.91,298.44.71,323.64.31,461.93.2
      24–311,866.48.32,031.17.42,238.67.22,622.05.8
      32 –4013,562.860.416,328.259.418,164.758.622,901.950.8
      41–503,410.015.24,412.716.04,609.114.99,292.120.6
      51–60928.34.11,391.15.11,567.25.13,933.08.7
      ≥61681.13.0911.53.31,868.16.03,357.67.5
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      1–1527,4594.125,8964.128,8543.925,4243.4
      16–2332,7444.929,6864.731,4494.324,3353.2
      24–3156,1268.346,4377.453,1897.243,6465.8
      32–40407,85960.4373,31459.4431,59258.6381,22350.8
      41–50102,54615.2100,88816.0109,51214.9154,67620.6
      51–6027,9164.131,8055.137,2375.165,4688.7
      ≥6120,4823.020,8413.344,3866.055,8907.5
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 28
      Figure 28Number of Hours Worked by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) in All Nursing Positions

      Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting

      Of those LPNs/LVNs who responded to the question, 30.6% indicated that a nursing home/extended care was their primary nursing practice setting. This represents an increase of 3.1% from 2020. Hospital settings were the second most frequently selected setting at 11.7% of LPNs/LVNs, followed by home health at 11.6% and ambulatory care settings at 8.6% (Table 72 and Figure 29).
      Table 72Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Primary Practice Setting2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LPV Survey RespondentsN = 22,989.1N = 26,459.8N = 30,055.4N = 43,306.2
      Hospital2,478.910.82,540.39.63,831.412.85,084.711.7
      Nursing home/extended care6,911.930.18,385.331.78,250.327.513,250.030.6
      Assisted living facility1,369.56.01,484.25.61,679.55.62,835.56.6
      Home health3,451.015.03,710.514.03,733.312.45,025.911.6
      Hospice--426.61.6639.82.1698.71.6
      Correctional facility670.22.9738.62.8729.32.4961.62.2
      School of nursing142.00.678.40.3173.70.6141.40.3
      Public health399.81.7498.31.9623.12.1972.62.3
      Dialysis center--165.80.6266.10.9310.40.7
      Community health922.64.0888.13.41,073.83.61,487.73.4
      School health service683.93.0697.42.6977.23.31,410.73.3
      Occupational health174.90.8166.60.6187.30.6278.40.6
      Ambulatory care setting2,061.29.01,797.36.82,588.28.63,702.98.6
      Insurance claims/benefits259.71.1241.30.9331.81.1518.51.2
      Policy/planning/regulatory/ licensing agency32.30.124.40.136.70.116.00.0
      Other3,431.214.94,616.717.44,933.916.46,611.215.3
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Hospital74,54410.858,0799.691,03412.884,63911.7
      Nursing home/extended care207,85430.1191,71531.7196,02627.5220,55930.6
      Assisted living facility41,1836.033,9335.639,9055.647,2006.6
      Home health103,77915.084,83414.088,70312.483,66111.6
      Hospice--9,7531.615,2022.111,6311.6
      Correctional facility20,1542.916,8872.817,3282.416,0072.2
      School of nursing4,2700.61,7920.34,1270.62,3540.3
      Public health12,0221.711,3941.914,8052.116,1902.3
      Dialysis center--3,7900.66,3230.95,1670.7
      Community health27,7454.020,3053.425,5133.624,7643.4
      School health service20,5653.015,9452.623,2183.323,4823.3
      Occupational health5,2600.83,8100.64,4500.64,6340.6
      Ambulatory care setting61,9849.041,0916.861,4958.661,6378.6
      Insurance claims/benefits7,8101.15,5170.97,8841.18,6321.2
      Policy/planning/regulatory/ licensing agency9730.15570.18720.12660.0
      Other103,18214.9105,55317.4117,22916.4110,04915.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 29
      Figure 29Most Reported Primary Nursing Practice Position Setting of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Primary Nursing Position Title

      About two-thirds (66.5%) of LPNs/LVNs reported staff nurse as their nursing position title. This is down from 2020, when 72.8% identified as a staff nurse (Table 73 and Figure 30).
      Table 73Primary Nursing Position Title of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Primary Title2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 23,567.8N = 26,776.9N = 30,512.5N = 44,122.7
      Consultant140.60.6152.70.6148.40.5257.40.6
      Nurse researcher65.00.351.20.266.30.279.80.2
      Nurse executive137.60.670.90.3120.60.4157.50.4
      Nurse manager1,365.45.81,661.56.21,680.25.52,955.96.7
      Nurse faculty/educator967.94.1257.51.0310.51.0481.01.1
      APRN401.71.79.00.0149.40.5110.60.3
      Staff nurse16,214.168.819,564.673.122,209.972.829,324.466.5
      Case manager595.32.5561.42.1842.82.83,708.48.4
      Other – health related3,444.214.64,275.516.04,768.815.66,049.813.7
      Other – not health related236.01.0172.70.7215.50.7997.92.3
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Consultant4,2270.63,4900.63,5260.54,2850.6
      Nurse researcher1,9550.31,1700.21,5750.21,3290.2
      Nurse executive4,1380.61,6210.32,8650.42,6210.4
      Nurse manager41,0605.837,9866.239,9215.549,2036.7
      Nurse faculty/educator29,1074.15,8871.07,3771.08,0071.1
      APRN12,0791.72060.03,5500.51,8410.3
      Staff nurse487,58968.8447,30873.1527,70572.8488,13166.5
      Case manager17,9022.512,8352.120,0252.861,7308.4
      Other – health related103,57214.697,75116.0113,30615.6100,70413.7
      Other – not health related7,0971.03,9490.75,1200.716,6112.3
      Note. APRN = advanced practice registered nurse. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 30
      Figure 30Most Reported Primary Nursing Position Title of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Are You Currently a Travel Nurse?

      In the 2022 survey, a new question was added: “Are you currently a travel nurse?” The majority (95.4%) of LPNs/LVNs indicated they were not a travel nurse (Table 74).
      Table 74Travel Nurses Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2022
      Travel Nurse2022
      n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 42,737.4
      Yes1,989.04.7
      No40,748.495.4
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Yes33,1084.7
      No678,29495.4
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Primary Nursing Position Specialty

      In 2022, 31.3% of LPNs/LVNs reported their primary practice specialty was geriatric/gerontology. This increased from 26.6% reported in 2020. The second most common position specialty in 2022 was home health at 8.4%, which was unchanged from 2020. Pediatrics was the third most often reported practice specialty at 7.4% followed by adult health at 7.0% (Table 75 and Figure 31).
      Table 75Primary Nursing Position Specialty of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs), 2015–2022
      Primary Position Specialty2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 21,932.4N = 25,214.9N = 28,417.9N = 36,204.7
      Acute care/critical care458.52.1670.02.71,157.64.11,227.73.4
      Adult health960.64.41,968.07.82,354.28.32,541.77.0
      Anesthesia18.00.117.60.122.50.136.90.1
      Cardiology--250.41.0312.51.1338.40.9
      Community262.61.2216.80.9323.61.1381.01.1
      Emergency/trauma157.20.7127.50.5261.60.9531.41.5
      Family health--1,712.46.81,840.36.51,832.65.1
      Genetics182.20.8----537.71.5
      Geriatric/gerontology6,064.127.77,685.830.57,545.926.611,348.131.3
      Home health2,109.39.62,228.28.82,372.58.43,055.98.4
      Informatics41.40.2----36.60.1
      Information technology------28.40.1
      Maternal-child health/obstetrics120.50.6225.10.9266.50.9308.10.9
      Medical-surgical777.33.5728.62.91,008.23.61,412.83.9
      Neonatal28.20.128.80.140.80.123.90.1
      Nephrology133.70.6201.00.8258.20.9402.21.1
      Neurology/neurosurgical90.60.4----177.10.5
      Occupational health154.50.7160.80.6183.40.7242.00.7
      Oncology137.10.6152.90.6252.50.9290.00.8
      Orthopedic185.50.9----256.30.7
      Palliative care/hospice348.21.6354.71.4490.71.7653.51.8
      Pediatrics1,326.06.11,880.27.51,819.56.42,660.37.4
      Perioperative93.10.476.40.3135.30.5189.00.5
      Primary care1,695.57.7----1,725.24.8
      Public health173.10.8257.61.0332.41.2456.41.3
      Psychiatric/mental health/substance abuse1,084.85.01,205.04.81,405.04.91,064.22.9
      Radiology24.20.1----14.10.0
      Rehabilitation847.73.91,081.54.3990.83.51,023.12.8
      School health612.92.8646.22.6870.13.1660.91.8
      Urology102.10.5----53.80.2
      Women’s health342.81.6291.01.2426.21.5240.40.7
      Other - clinical specialties--2,724.110.83,264.911.51,986.95.5
      Other - nonclinical specialties--324.11.3482.91.7468.01.3
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Acute care/critical care13,7872.115,3192.727,5044.120,4373.4
      Adult health28,8884.444,9957.855,9368.342,3097.0
      Anesthesia5420.14010.15350.16140.1
      Cardiology--5,7251.07,4251.15,6330.9
      Community7,8961.24,9560.97,6891.16,3421.1
      Emergency/trauma4,7290.72,9150.56,2160.98,8461.5
      Family health--39,1516.843,7256.530,5055.1
      Genetics5,4800.8----8,9501.5
      Geriatric/gerontology182,35927.7175,72230.5179,29026.6188,89931.3
      Home health63,4309.650,9448.856,3708.450,8698.4
      Informatics1,2440.2----6100.1
      Information technology------4730.1
      Maternal-child health/obstetrics3,6230.65,1480.96,3320.95,1280.9
      Medical-surgical23,3753.516,6592.923,9553.623,5183.9
      Neonatal8480.16590.19690.13980.1
      Nephrology4,0220.64,5950.86,1350.96,6961.1
      Neurology/neurosurgical2,7230.4----2,9480.5
      Occupational health4,6470.73,6770.64,3580.74,0280.7
      Oncology4,1240.63,4970.65,9990.94,8280.8
      Orthopedic5,5770.9----4,2670.7
      Palliative care/hospice10,4711.68,1091.411,6591.710,8781.8
      Pediatrics39,8756.142,9887.543,2316.444,2827.4
      Perioperative2,7980.41,7470.33,2150.53,1470.5
      Primary care50,9867.7----28,7174.8
      Public health5,2070.85,8891.07,8981.27,5971.3
      Psychiatric/mental health/substance abuse32,6225.027,5504.833,3834.917,7142.9
      Radiology7270.1----2350.0
      Rehabilitation25,4933.924,7274.323,5413.517,0312.8
      School health18,4322.814,7742.620,6743.111,0011.8
      Urology3,0710.5----8960.2
      Women’s health10,3081.66,6531.210,1261.54,0020.7
      Other - clinical specialties--62,28210.877,57411.533,0745.5
      Other - nonclinical specialties--7,4111.311,4741.77,7911.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 31
      Figure 31Most Reported Primary Nursing Position Specialty of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Providing Direct Patient Care—Primary Nursing Position

      In 2022, 78.6% of LPNs/LVNs reported providing direct patient care in their primary nursing position. In 2020, the first year this question was asked, 77.8% of LPNs/LVNs said they provided direct patient care in their primary nursing position (Table 76).
      Table 76Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Providing Direct Patient Care Through Primary Nursing Position, 2020–2022
      Provide Direct Patient Care2020 (N = 5,140.8)2022 (N = 8,035.0)
      n%n%
      Yes4,393.885.56,565.381.7
      No747.014.51,469.718.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Secondary Nursing Position Setting

      Of the 20.9% of LPNs/LVNs who have more than one nursing position (Table 70), 29.9% reported practicing in a nursing home/extended care setting, 17.8% in home health, and 11.7% in an assisted living facility (Table 77 and Figure 32).
      Table 77Secondary Nursing Position Setting Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2015–2022
      Secondary Nursing Position2015 (N = 3,018.7)2017 (N = 4,376.2)2020 (N = 5,067.9)2022 (N = 8,416.1)
      n%n%n%n%
      Hospital180.46.0261.26.0461.19.1756.79.0
      Nursing home/extended care813.326.91,422.032.51,608.231.72,516.429.9
      Assisted living facility232.57.7332.37.6374.87.4983.411.7
      Home health961.331.91,173.126.81,189.723.51,498.717.8
      Hospice--115.72.6177.83.5349.74.2
      Correctional facility108.73.6136.63.1125.12.5228.62.7
      School of nursing32.71.110.40.254.81.197.01.2
      Public health30.31.055.81.354.11.1179.72.1
      Dialysis center--35.00.830.40.641.50.5
      Community health69.12.385.22.0108.02.1176.72.1
      School health service42.11.4111.92.6109.92.2211.92.5
      Occupational health16.90.631.10.744.30.9101.91.2
      Ambulatory care setting78.42.6121.72.8165.73.3285.73.4
      Insurance claims/benefits6.50.222.80.525.80.545.80.5
      Policy/planning/regulatory/licensing agency15.90.516.60.46.20.136.50.4
      Other430.514.3444.810.2532.010.5905.910.8
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 32
      Figure 32Most Reported Secondary Nursing Practice Position Setting Among Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Secondary Nursing Position Title

      Of those LPNs/LVNs who reported more than one nursing position, 66.4% reported being staff nurses in their secondary position. This represents a decline from 2020, when 77.7% of LPNs/LVNs were staff nurses. About 20% of respondents reported other health-related titles (Table 78 and Figure 33).
      Table 78Secondary Nursing Position Title of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2015–2022
      Secondary Nursing Title2015 (N = 2,980.3)2017 (N = 4,217.2)2020 (N = 4,942.1)2022 (N = 8,533.0)
      n%n%n%n%
      Consultant37.51.345.21.147.01.0170.32.0
      Nurse researcher7.00.21.30.07.30.218.60.2
      Nurse executive10.40.410.00.28.60.245.70.5
      Nurse manager59.92.0141.43.4153.23.1350.04.1
      Nurse faculty/educator132.04.458.41.4107.92.2165.41.9
      APRN34.11.12.60.136.10.724.70.3
      Staff nurse2,167.272.73,309.278.53,842.277.75,666.066.4
      Case manager53.81.866.61.6111.62.3240.42.8
      Other – health related440.314.8528.912.5586.211.91,682.919.7
      Other – not health related38.31.353.51.342.10.9169.12.0
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing.
      Figure 33
      Figure 33Most Reported Secondary Nursing Position Title of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs)

      Providing Direct Patient Care—Secondary Nursing Practice Position

      In 2022, 81.7% of LPNs/LVNs reported providing direct patient care in their secondary nursing position. In 2020, the first year this question was asked, 85.5% of LPNs/LVNs said they provided direct patient care in their secondary nursing position (Table 79).
      Table 79Providing Direct Patient Care—Secondary Nursing Practice Position of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2020–2022
      Provide Direct Care2020 (N = 5,140.8)2022 (N = 8,035.0)
      n%n%
      Yes4,393.885.56,565.381.7
      No747.014.51,469.718.3
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Annual Earnings

      2022 Pretax Annual Earnings From Primary Nursing Position

      The median pretax annual earnings for LPNs/LVNs grew to $50,000 in 2022. Pretax wages grew by about 14% since 2020, when the median pretax annual wage was $44,000. Compared with 2020, the percentage of LPNs/LVNs earning less than $40,000 annually (24.3%) decreased by 10.2% in 2022, while those earning between $40,000 and $60,000 (42.4%) increased by 1.5% between 2020 and 2022. The percentage of respondents in categories making between $60,000 and $80,000 per year (22.0%) also showed an increase of 6.3% from 2020 to 2022. The proportion of LPNs/LVNs making between $80,00 and $100,000 (6.8%) increased by 2.5%, and those making more than $100,000 per year (4.6%) remained the same as reported in 2020 (Table 80 and Figure 34).
      Table 80Annual Earnings of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) for Nurses’ Primary Nursing Position, 2015–2022
      Annual Earnings2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentsN = 19,436.4N = 24,473.1N = 26,035.6N = 34,311.9
      <$40,00010,138.352.211,190.345.78,988.034.58,321.624.3
      $40,000 to <$60,0007,088.336.59,819.440.110,653.640.914,546.742.4
      $60,000 to <$80,0001,418.57.32,243.99.24,073.615.77,559.422.0
      $80,000 to <$100,000174.60.9361.11.51,118.14.32,318.46.8
      >$100,000616.83.2858.43.51,202.34.61,565.84.6
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      <$40,000304,87752.2255,84545.7213,55434.5138,52124.3
      $40,000 to <$60,000213,15736.5224,50140.1253,12940.9242,14342.4
      $60,000 to <$80,00042,6577.351,3039.296,78815.7125,83322.0
      $80,000 to <$100,0005,2500.98,2561.526,5664.338,5926.8
      >$100,00018,5483.219,6263.528,5674.626,0644.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.
      Figure 34
      Figure 34Annual Earnings of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) for Primary Nursing Position

      Earnings by Gender and Specialty

      As was seen in the analysis of RNs, the annual median wage was greater for male LPNs/LVNs across most specialties in 2022. Female LPNs/LVNs reported higher earnings in anesthesia, emergency/trauma care, informatics, information technology, and orthopedics. LPNs/LVNs in informatics, radiology, rehabilitation, and palliative care/hospice reported the highest median wage, while LPNs/LVNs in school health, women’s health, neonatology, and family health reported the lowest median wage (Table 81).
      Table 81Median Annual Earnings of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses for Primary Nursing Position by Nurses’ Gender and Specialty, 2022
      SpecialtyMaleFemaleNonbinaryTotal
      nMdnnMdnnMdnnMdn
      Acute care/critical care41$62,000369$50,0004$53,000414$50,000
      Adult health76$59,000588$50,0002$30,556666$50,000
      Anesthesia1$52,0008$52,900--9$52,000
      Cardiology4$68,100125$48,000--129$48,000
      Community12$56,500134$50,0001$80,000147$50,000
      Emergency/trauma21$42,000104$47,500--125$46,000
      Family health18$55,000758$42,0002$25,000778$42,000
      Genetics12$57,500210$51,1001$34,000223$52,000
      Geriatric/gerontology266$60,0003,486$52,00010$47,0003,762$52,000
      Home health68$55,500816$48,0003$45,000887$49,000
      Informatics4$55,00022$66,000--26$63,500
      Information technology2$47,50016$56,000--18$51,000
      Maternal-child health/obstetrics--111$45,000--111$45,000
      Medical-surgical40$50,000403$45,0001$18,000444$45,000
      Neonatal1$48,0007$40,000--8$41,000
      Nephrology12$59,00093$50,000--105$50,000
      Neurology/neurosurgical7$52,00050$44,000--57$45,696
      Occupational health13$60,00092$47,1322$62,000105$49,000
      Oncology6$48,25081$45,000--87$45,000
      Orthopedic3$39,590109$45,000--112$44,800
      Palliative care/hospice15$62,000199$52,0002$22,500216$52,932
      Pediatrics25$50,000721$42,000--746$43,000
      Perioperative6$53,65056$47,183--62$47,333
      Primary care38$60,000740$48,7101$120,000779$49,483
      Public health4$61,500142$43,7501$70,000147$45,000
      Psychiatric/mental health/substance abuse40$56,500264$50,0001$63,000305$50,000
      Radiology1$69,0001$50,000--2$59,500
      Rehabilitation30$55,500247$54,6161$42,000278$54,808
      School health6$41,850168$34,500--174$35,000
      Urology3$50,00019$47,000--22$47,500
      Women’s health--64$41,000--64$41,000
      Other – clinical specialties3$90,00057$50,000-60$51,325
      Other – nonclinical specialties45$60,000589$50,0001$52,000635$50,000
      Total823$58,00010,849$49,18431$44,00013,992$50,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Earnings by Highest Education

      As was found in previous surveys, LPNs/LVNs holding a baccalaureate degree reported the highest median annual wage ($60,000). LPNs/LVNs with an ADN ($50,000) earned similar wages to those with a vocational/practical certificate ($50,000) and those with a diploma ($48,000) (Table 82).
      Table 82Median Annual Earnings of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses of Primary Nursing Position and by Highest Education, 2017–2022
      Highest Education Level201720202022
      nMdnnMdnnMdn
      Vocational/practical certificate-nursing16,750$42,00017,947$43,00010,238$50,000
      Diploma3,709$41,6003,589$43,0002,174$48,000
      Associate degree2,199$40,0003,565$45,0002,119$50,000
      Baccalaureate degree227$51,619566$60,000262$60,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Earnings by State

      Reported annual median wage rose in most states in 2022. Only five states and territories did not experience annual median wage increases. The highest median earning for LPNs/LVNs were practicing in California ($64,000), Rhode Island ($60,000), Oregon ($60,000), Nevada ($60,000), and New Jersey, Massachusetts, Hawaii, and Connecticut ($58,000 each). The lowest median earnings for LPNs/LVNs were in West Virginia ($40,020), Alabama ($44,000), and Arkansas, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Tennessee ($45,000 each). As stated above, all but five states saw increases in wages between 2020 and 2022, with 35 states seeing median wages increase by more than 10%. Wages rose between 5%–10% in nine states and by 1%–5% in three states. Wages did not change from 2020 in three states/jurisdiction (New Hampshire, New Mexico, and District of Columbia), while median annual earnings declined in two states (New York: -16.7% and Texas: -0.8%) (Table 83).
      Table 83Median Annual Earnings in Primary Nursing Position by Jurisdictions Where Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Are Currently Practicing, 2015–2022
      State/Jurisdiction2015201720202022
      Alabama$33,000$35,000$39,000$44,000
      Alaska$50,000$52,000$56,559$58,972
      Arizona$48,000$48,000$52,000$55,000
      Arkansas$33,500$37,000$40,000$45,000
      California$45,000$48,000$55,836$64,000
      Colorado$42,000$45,000$50,000$55,000
      Connecticut$49,000$50,000$52,360$58,000
      Delaware$45,000$47,000$50,000$52,000
      District of Columbia$53,000$50,000$55,000$55,000
      Florida$37,000$40,000$43,210$50,000
      Georgia$36,000$39,800$42,000$50,000
      Hawaii$45,000$46,000$50,000$58,000
      Idaho$32,560$38,000$42,000$47,212
      Illinois$40,000$40,000$45,000$50,000
      Indiana$36,000$40,000$45,000$50,000
      Iowa$34,640$36,000$41,000$45,000
      Kansas$35,000$39,000$41,500$48,000
      Kentucky$35,000$40,000$42,000$45,000
      Louisiana$35,000$38,000$40,000$45,000
      Maine$36,000$40,000$43,500$50,000
      Maryland$45,000$50,000$53,012$56,486
      Massachusetts$48,000$50,000$54,000$58,000
      Michigan$35,000$40,000$45,000$50,000
      Minnesota$33,000$36,750$40,000$45,000
      Mississippi$35,000$35,000$37,000$45,000
      Missouri
      Missouri did not participate in the 2015 and 2017 surveys.
      --$40,000$50,000
      Montana$36,260$37,440$43,000$47,000
      Nebraska$33,000$38,000$40,000$45,000
      Nevada$48,000$49,000$55,000$60,000
      New Hampshire$42,000$45,500$50,000$50,000
      New Jersey$45,000$48,000$54,000$58,000
      New Mexico$45,000$45,000$50,000$50,000
      New York$40,000$45,000$60,000$50,000
      North Carolina$38,000$41,000$44,000$50,000
      North Dakota$35,000$37,000$40,000$45,000
      Ohio$34,000$36,000$40,000$47,000
      Oklahoma$35,000$37,000$40,000$45,000
      Oregon$42,240$47,000$53,000$60,000
      Pennsylvania$39,000$40,320$44,000$50,000
      Rhode Island$45,000$50,000$50,000$60,000
      South Carolina$37,124$40,000$42,000$48,000
      South Dakota$30,000$34,865$38,000$45,500
      Tennessee$34,000$36,000$40,000$45,000
      Texas$40,082$43,000$49,383$49,000
      Utah$36,000$41,000$41,000$47,646
      Vermont$37,128$42,000$45,000$50,381
      Virginia$36,000$40,000$44,000$50,000
      Washington$44,000$48,000$54,000$55,000
      West Virginia$32,000$35,000$36,000$40,020
      Wisconsin$35,000$38,000$40,000$50,000
      Wyoming$40,000$40,500$44,000$50,000
      Northern Mariana Islands$55,000$28,500$32,959$45,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.
      a Missouri did not participate in the 2015 and 2017 surveys.

      Earnings by Years Licensed and Age

      As was previously noted with RNs, wages for LPNs/LVNs saw steady increases by years of experience except for LPNs/LVNs with more than 10years of experience, which did not change. LPNs/LVNs reported wage increases across the younger age groups. Earnings in the 30 to 34 age group increased by 14.2% over the 17 to 29 age group, 5.0% in the 35 to 39 age group, and 4.2% in the 40 to 44 age group over their younger age groups. Two age groups (60-64 and ≥65) reported median wage decreases when compared to the next youngest age group (Table 84).
      Table 84Median Annual Earnings of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses for Primary Nursing Position by Nurses’ Years Licensed and Age, 2022
      Number of Years Licensed0–12–56–10≥11Total
      Age, ynMdnnMdnnMdnnMdnnMdn
      17–29299$36,000615$42,000126$41,3757$49,8201,047$40,000
      30–34132$40,000410$47,217461$46,000118$46,0001,121$45,696
      35–3997$40,000305$46,630396$48,000542$49,0001,340$48,000
      40–4483$40,000273$50,000385$50,000873$50,0001,614$50,000
      45–4962$45,000173$50,000291$52,0001,075$51,0001,601$50,000
      50–5455$49,000138$53,500256$53,0001,438$52,0001,887$52,000
      55–5920$53,00084$48,250151$56,0001,520$52,0001,775$52,000
      60–6413$40,00032$54,500108$50,0001,771$50,0001,924$50,000
      ≥655$54,00038$43,00049$52,0001,591$47,0001,683$47,000
      Total766$40,0002,068$46,1132,223$50,0008,935$50,000
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Annual earnings include overtime and bonuses but do not include sign-on bonuses.

      Telehealth Utilization

      Percentage of Time Providing Telehealth

      Telehealth utilization by LPNs/LVNs remains relatively unchanged from previous years, with a little less than half of LPNs/LVNs (44.5%) not providing services via telehealth. However, slightly more LPNs/LVNs who reported utilizing telehealth all the time rose to 15.2%, an increase of 3.8% from the 2020 survey. About a quarter (23.4%) of LPNs/LVNs spend up to a quarter of their time and 12.5% spend between a quarter and half of their time proving services via telehealth (Table 85 and Figure 35).
      Table 85Percentage of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Spend Providing Telehealth, 2015–2022
      Provide Telehealth2015201720202022
      n%n%n%n%
      LPN/LVN Survey RespondentN = 23,619.9N = 27,760.6N = 31,095.7N = 39,650.3
      Never12,723.153.912,715.845.815,504.349.917,650.444.5
      1%–25%5,496.623.36,436.423.26,799.821.99,283.123.4
      26%–50%2,207.19.32,821.310.22,993.39.64,965.512.5
      51%–75%1,490.66.32,253.88.12,240.47.21,716.64.3
      76%–100%1,702.47.23,533.312.73,557.911.46,034.715.2
      U.S. LPN/LVN Population
      Never382,60653.9290,72245.8368,38149.9293,80644.5
      1%–25%165,29423.3147,15723.2161,56321.9154,52623.4
      26%–50%66,3739.364,50310.271,1219.682,65612.5
      51%–75%44,8266.351,5298.153,2327.228,5744.3
      76%–100%51,1957.280,78112.784,53511.4100,45315.2
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 35
      Figure 35Percent of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Providing Telehealth

      Telehealth Across State Borders

      About 71% of LPNs/LVNs did not utilize telehealth to provide services to patients across state lines in 2022. Twenty percent of LPNs/LVNs reported spending between 1% and 25% of their time providing services to patients in other states through telehealth. Utilization of services across state borders through telehealth declined in compared to the reported 2020 rates (Table 86 and Figure 36).
      Table 86Percentage of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Spend Providing Telehealth Across State Borders, 2015–2022
      Provide Telehealth2015 (N = 11,421.5)2017 (N = 12,214.3)2020 (N = 12,981.4)2022 (N = 23,516.1)
      n%n%n%n%
      Never7,566.566.26,849.956.17,413.457.116,616.970.7
      1%–25%3,140.427.54,040.133.14,062.831.34,721.920.1
      26%–50%371.13.2622.95.1692.75.31,043.34.4
      51%–75%180.41.6372.23.1390.83.0288.81.2
      76%–100%163.11.4329.32.7421.73.3845.13.6
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 36
      Figure 36Percent of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Spend Providing Telehealth Across State Borders

      Telehealth Across National Borders

      A little more than 10% of LPNs/LVNs in the United States provide services via telehealth across international borders. This rate has changed little from previous surveys (Table 87 and Figure 37).
      Table 87Percentage of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Spend Providing Telehealth Across National Borders, 2015–2022
      Provide Telehealth2015 (N = 11,089.2)2017 (N = 11,117.1)2020 (N = 12,295.4)2022 (N = 16,513.5)
      n%n%n%n%
      Never10,201.892.09,800.388.211,068.090.014,768.689.4
      1%–25%633.35.7807.07.3814.26.61,074.26.5
      26%–50%129.01.2208.11.9193.31.6313.31.9
      51%–75%82.00.7189.01.7115.80.966.30.4
      76%–100%43.10.4112.71.0104.20.9291.21.8
      Note. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 37
      Figure 37Percent of Time Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) Spend Providing Telehealth Across National Borders

      Modes of Communications Used for Telehealth

      As seen in previous years, the use of the telephone is the most common mode (88.1%) of communication for telehealth provision by LPNs/LVNs. The use of electronic messaging was the second most common mode (35.6%) and has increased markedly in use since 2020. Email was the third most common mode at 32.8% and was relatively unchanged since 2020. The use of video call technology was used in 30.9% of provisions of telehealth service and had increased by 19.6% since 2020 (Table 88 and Figure 38).
      Table 88Modes of Communication Used by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses for Telehealth, 2015–2022
      Mode of Telehealth2015 (N = 8,881.7)2017 (N = 11,164.0)2020 (N = 12,154.9)2022 (N = 16,948.4)
      n%n%n%n%
      Electronic messaging1,947.721.92,510.822.53,280.427.06,036.335.6
      Virtual ICU84.91.0125.21.1287.52.4830.24.9
      Telephone8,498.595.710,405.093.211,274.792.814,924.388.1
      Email2,622.229.53,226.228.93,706.730.55,565.432.8
      Video call207.42.3260.72.31,371.811.35,236.430.9
      Other883.09.91,027.29.2998.18.21,631.89.6
      Note. ICU = intensive care unit. Survey participants were asked to answer this question only if they were actively employed in nursing. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.
      Figure 38
      Figure 38Modes of Communication Used by Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses (LPNs/LVNs) for Telehealth

      Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

      Impact on Employment

      The coronavirus pandemic affected LPN/LVN respondents most through its impact on their workload. More than 60% reported an increase in their workload due to the pandemic. About 11% of LPN/LVN respondents reported a change in their practice setting because of COVID-19 (Table 89).
      Table 89Impact of COVID on Employment of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2022
      Impact%
      My workload increased62.9
      I became a travel nurse3.7
      I changed my practice setting11.4
      I started doing telehealth4.8
      I left nursing4.0
      I retired5.9
      No impact14.4
      Other17.2
      Note. Respondents were asked to select all that apply. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Are You Emotionally Drained?

      About a quarter of LPNs/LVNs reported they were emotionally drained from work every day and another 25.8% reported they were emotionally drained a few times per week. Thus, about a half of LPNs/LVNs reported that they were emotionally drained from work at least a few times every week. Only 6.9% reported never feeling emotionally drained from work (Table 90).
      Table 90Feeling of Being Emotionally Drained From Work of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses, 2022
      Felt emotionally drained2022 (N = 48,786.9)
      n%
      Never3,385.16.9
      A few times a year5,032.310.3
      Once a month or less3,535.87.3
      A few times a month7,823.616.0
      Once a week4,365.89.0
      A few times a week12,580.425.8
      Every day12,064.024.7
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Used Up?

      Over half of LPNs/LVNs reported feeling used up at the end of their workday, with more than half of this group feeling that way every day. Less than 20% reported feeling used up at the end of their workday only a few times per year or never (Table 91).
      Table 91Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Who Reported Feeling Used Up at the End of Their Workday, 2022
      Felt Used Up2022 (N = 48,421.6)
      n%
      Never4,259.88.8
      A few times a year3,783.97.8
      Once a month or less3,465.17.2
      A few times a month5,943.512.3
      Once a week4,288.88.9
      A few times a week12,397.325.6
      Every day14,283.429.5
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Fatigued When You Awake?

      Over a quarter of LPNs/LVNs reported feeling fatigued when they get up and have to face another day on the job every day. Another 24.2% reported feeling fatigued when they get up and have to face another day on the job a few times a week. About 10% reported never feeling fatigued when they get up and have to face another day on the job (Table 92).
      Table 92Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Who Reported Feeling Fatigued When They Get Up, 2022
      Felt Fatigued2022 (N = 48,501.1)
      n%
      Never5,104.710.5
      A few times a year4,594.49.5
      Once a month or less3,855.68.0
      A few times a month6,175.412.7
      Once a week4,340.09.0
      A few times a week11,716.824.2
      Every day12,714.226.2
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Do You Feel Burned-Out From Work?

      A quarter of LPNs/LVNs reported feeling burned-out from work every day, and nearly 20% reported feeling burned-out at least once per week. About 13% reported never feeling burned-out from work (Table 93).
      Table 93Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Who Reported Feeling Burned-Out From Work, 2022
      Felt Burned-Out2022 (N = 48,541.6)
      n%
      Never6,211.212.8
      A few times a year6,315.613.0
      Once a month or less4,158.78.6
      A few times a month6,193.912.8
      Once a week3,881.58.0
      A few times a week9,482.219.5
      Every day12,298.625.3
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      How Often Did You Feel You Were at the End of Your Rope?

      About 30% of LPNs/LVNs reported feeling they were at the end of their rope at least a few times per week, with half of this group feeling like that every day. About a third of LPNs/LVNs never felt like they were at the end of their rope (Table 94).
      Table 94Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses Who Reported Feeling at the End of Their Rope, 2022
      Felt at the End of Their Rope2022 (N = 48,323.7)
      n%
      Never15,773.132.6
      A few times a year5,867.512.1
      Once a month or less3,840.28.0
      A few times a month4,924.310.2
      Once a week3,789.27.8
      A few times a week6,839.514.2
      Every day7,289.915.1
      Note. This question was not administered in the jurisdictions of Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, Washington, or Wyoming.

      Discussion and Implications

      Demographics

      Many older nurses left the workforce between 2020 and 2022. This decline was associated with estimated losses to the workforce of at least 200,000 experienced RNs and 60,000 experienced LPNs/LVNs. The loss of the intellectual capital of older nurses is concerning, but that loss is somewhat offset by the growing number of younger nurses in the profession.
      The workforce in 2022 is more demographically diverse and representative of the country’s population than in any year in which this study was previously conducted. The racial composition reflects growth in diversity with increases reflected for Hispanic and multiracial nursing categories. It is unclear whether this increase in diversity will slow. After years of decline, the proportion of RNs and LPNs/LVNs identifying as White/Caucasian in the youngest age ranges has risen back to the level of the overall population mean.
      Though women continue to account for the majority of nurses, the proportion of men licensed as RNs or LPNs/LVNs in the country has increased steadily since at least 2015. Additionally, male nurses are more racially diverse than their female counterparts. Although the rate of growth appears to be leveling, this is a positive trend for gender diversity in the profession.

      Employment

      Nursing employment jumped significantly. About 88% of all licensed nurses who maintain licensure are employed in nursing; among those who are employed in nursing, roughly 71% work full-time, 10% work part-time, and 7% work per diem shifts. While the proportion of nurses working in nursing part-time or per diem has remained steady since 2020, the proportion of nurses working full-time has increased by about 5% during this same time.
      Over the past reporting periods, there has been a consistent number of licensed RNs and LPNs/LVNs who report working in fields other than nursing. Using weighted sample values, this translates to approximately 200,000 licensees. Proportionally more LPNs/LVNs than RNs work in a field other than nursing (5.5% vs 3.4%, respectively). Despite recent concerns about nurses leaving the profession, a larger proportion is now practicing in nursing roles than in previous years.
      But future employment may still be impacted by the exit of nurses. In the survey, respondents were asked if they plan to retire in the next 5 years, and 28% of all nurses replied positively to the question, an increase from the 21% who responded positively in 2020. These data are consistent with the idea that the long-anticipated “retirement tsunami of nurses” (
      • McMenamin P.
      Tsunami warning: Massive RN retirements coming.
      ) has begun.
      For nurses who report being unemployed, about 47% of RNs and roughly 42% of LPNs/LVNs cite taking care of home and family as their reason for not working. The COVID-19 pandemic is another significant reason reported for unemployment among RNs (22.6%) and LPNs/LVNs (20.2%). In past reports, about 11% of RNs and 17% of LPNs/LVNs indicated a disability was the main reason for being unemployed, but this has declined in 2022. About 7% of RNs and 13% of LPNs/LVNs reported a disability as the reason for being unemployed in 2022.
      Most nurses (82.4% of RNs and 79.2% of LPNs/LVNs) work in only one position in nursing. However, 17.6% of RNs and 20.9% of LPNs/LVNs reported that they work in two or more nursing positions. Nearly 53% of nurses work 32 to 40hours per week and about a third of nurses work more than 40hours each week.
      Hospitals continue to be the primary practice setting for RNs (57.5%), followed by the ambulatory care setting (10.4%), nursing homes (3.9%), and home health (3.4%). The primary practice setting for LPNs/LVNs is nursing homes/extended care settings (30.6%), followed by hospitals (11.7%) and home health (11.6%). In comparison to 2020, increased proportions of RNs and LPNs/LVNs reported providing direct patient care in their jobs.

      Education

      In the 2022 survey, the educational accomplishment of RNs increased with more than70% of the workforce holding a baccalaureate degree or higher. But the nation continues to fall short of the National Academy of Medicine’s (formerly the Institute of Medicine) goal for 80% of RNs to hold a baccalaureate degree or higher (). This goal remains relevant and is discussed in the
      • National Academy of Medicine
      The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equities.
      report on the future of nursing.
      The proportion of baccalaureate-prepared and master’s-prepared nurses increased from 2020 to 2022, while the proportion of nurses earning a diploma, associate degree, or vocational/practical certificate decreased from 2020 to 2022.
      There is evidence that RNs and LPNs/LVNs are continuing their nursing education after obtaining their initial nursing license. From 2015 through 2022, diplomas in nursing and ADNs decreased from 39.3% to 28.4%, while bachelor’s of science in nursing, master’s of science in nursing, DNPs, and other doctoral degrees increased from 59.9% to 70.8%; however, PhDs remained fixed around 0.9%. No growth or slow growth of PhD-prepared nurses is concerning because this population of nurses has the expertise to conduct research, generate new knowledge, and serve in the role of faculty to prepare the nation’s future nurses.
      Younger nurses tended to hold a baccalaureate degree as their highest level of nursing education, while older nurses tended to have a nursing diploma or associate degree as their highest level of nursing education. The highest level of education was very similar for male and female nurses with respect to baccalaureate and associate degrees. However, male RNs tended to hold doctorate degrees at a slightly higher proportion than female RNs (3.1% vs. 2.6%).

      Licensure

      As in previous years, most RNs (96%) and LPNs/LVNs (99%) obtained their initial nursing license in the United States. However, evidence suggests that these nurses are less experienced now than in previous years. The proportion of RNs licensed for 20 or fewer years was at the highest level in 2022 (62.5%) when compared to the previous three surveys. The same trend was reported in the LPN/LVN workforce; in 2022, 69.4% of the responding LPNs/LVNs were licensed for 20 or fewer years.
      By contrast, APRN credentials and multistate licenses are now more prevalent. The proportion of RNs holding an APRN credential recovered from the 5-year low recorded in 2020 (6.6%) and was at its second-highest level (9.8%) in 2022. The reported prevalence of APRN credentials was only 0.2% lower than the highest level of 10% in 2017. Although the proportion of nurses holding a multistate license increased by 6.3% for RNs and 7.5% for LPNs/LVNs in the past 2years, fewer than a third reported actively using it. Of the few who reported using it, most used it for providing telehealth services. travel nursing, and multistate practice.

      Annual Earnings

      Nursing incomes for both RNs and LPNs/LVNs have increased annually by about 7% from 2020 to 2021. with the median RN income increasing from $70,000 to $80,000 and the median LPN/LVN income increasing from $44,000 to $50,000. RNs’ earnings grew in every state except New Hampshire and Tennessee. Similarly, earnings for LPNs/LVNs grew in every state except for five. Wages did not change in three states (New Hampshire, New Mexico, and the District of Columbia) and declined in two (New York and Texas).
      Inflation and increased demand due to the pandemic are likely contributors to the increase in wages, but another possible contributing explanation is that highly paid travel nurses were common during the pandemic. While only 6% of RNs and 5% of LPNs/LVNs are currently travel nurses, the demand for travel nurses was much higher during the first year of the pandemic. In 2020, the number of travel nurses grew by 35% over the previous year and wages grew by 25% (
      • Yang Y.T.
      • Mason D.J.
      COVID-19’s impact on nursing shortages, the rise of travel nurses, and price gouging.
      ). As the use of travel nurses decreases, it will be interesting to see how this affects future earnings growth.

      Telehealth

      While telehealth has become a major focus of pandemic healthcare delivery, it does not seem to have changed how nurses use telehealth overall. However, there is some reason to believe the use of telehealth is increasing for some nurses. Nurses who spend much of their time providing services via telehealth increased since 2020. It is likely that nurses working in areas with high telehealth utilization, such as primary care and ambulatory care settings, are beginning to learn how to best use telehealth to provide nursing services. Both RNs and LPNs/LVNs saw a large increase in the use of video calls to deliver services (24.4% for RNs and 19.6% for LPNs/LVNs) since 2020.

      The Impact of COVID-19

      The COVID-19 pandemic had a deleterious impact on nurses’ work and emotional well-being. Over 60% of all nurses reported an increase in their workload due to COVID-19, while 16% of RNs and 11% of LPNs/LVNs reported changing their practice settings. Consequently, it was not surprising that the majority of nurses reported feeling emotionally drained from work, used up at the end of their workday, and fatigued when they woke up. A considerable proportion also reported feeling at the end of their rope and burned out from work. The toll of COVID-19 on nurses requires urgent attention.

      Conclusion

      In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the nursing workforce has undergone a dramatic shift with the loss of hundreds of thousands of experienced RNs and LPNs/LVNs. The nursing workforce has become younger and more diverse, with increases reflected in Hispanic/Latino and multiracial nursing categories, in addition to a steady increase in the proportion of men licensed. An increasing proportion of the RN workforce holds a baccalaureate degree or higher, moving closer to goals established by the National Academy of Medicine (2011). Salaries have notably increased for RNs and LPNs/LVNs, likely due to inflation and increased demand for nursing services. With the majority of nurses reporting feeling emotionally drained from work, used up at the end of their workday, and fatigued when they wake up, and with about a quarter of the population contemplating leaving the profession, the impact of the pandemic may still be felt in the future.

      Appendices

      Appendix A 2022 National Workforce Study Questionnaire

      Appendix B Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

      Registered Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

      A formal nonresponse bias analysis was conducted following the close of the survey. Although response rates are a valuable indicator of survey quality, they are not a good measure of response bias. An analysis of basic demographic data (gender and age) for all registered nurse (RN) licensees sampled from the Nursys database was used to compare the survey respondents and nonrespondents to determine the representativeness of the survey participants. The analysis was restricted to the states in the mailout portion of the survey who allowed the data to be shared from the Nursys database.
      Variables in the data file came from both the Nursys database (i.e., the frame data) and responses to the survey (i.e., survey data). The variables used in the nonresponse analysis were from the frame and include state, date of birth, gender, and ethnicity. The dependent variable in the analysis was whether or not the sampled RN population completed the questionnaire.

      Preliminary Analysis

      Of the 150,698 RNs in the sample frame, 26,757 responded for a response rate of 17.8%
      This response rate corresponds to the American Association of Public Opinion’s Response Rate 1 (the minimum response rate), in which the numerator is the number of completed questionnaires and the denominator is the total sample size. Retrieved from https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf
      (Table B1). Table B2 shows the frequencies for gender. Table B3 shows the descriptive statistics for age. The only demographic information used for the following analyses come from Nursys, not the survey.
      Table B1Response Bias of Registered Nurses: Response Rate (N = 150,698)
      Response Statusn%
      Nonresponse123,94182.2
      Response26,75717.8
      Table B2Response Bias of Registered Nurses: Gender (N = 150,698)
      StatusGendern%Valid %
      ValidFemale80,44453.489.2
      Male9,6956.410.8
      Total90,13959.8100.0
      MissingRestricted/unknown21,34214.2
      Missing39,21726.0
      Total57,60538.2
      Table B3Response Bias of Registered Nurses: Descriptive Statistics for Age
      nMSDMinMax
      Age, y83,79746.314.02098

      Bivariate analysis

      Table B4 shows the bivariate relationship between gender from the sample frame and whether or not the respondent completed the survey. There were far fewer men in the database (9,695 men compared to 80,444 women), and they were less likely to complete the survey (12.6% among men compared to 17.0% among women).
      Table B4Response Bias of Registered Nurses: Survey Completion Rate by Gender (N = 150,698)
      GendernComplete survey?
      No, %Yes, %
      Female80,44483.017.0
      Male9,69587.412.6
      Total90,13983.516.5
      Note. χ2 (1, N = 90,139) = 121.5, p < .001.
      Table B5 displays the mean age of RNs. On average, those who completed the survey were 4.9 years older than the nonrespondents. This relationship was statistically significant.
      Table B5Response Bias RNs: Differences in Mean Age by Survey Completion
      Complete survey?nAge, y, M (SD)
      No69,67645.5 (13.7)
      Yes14,12150.4 (14.5)
      Total83,79746.3 (14.0)
      Note. A t test showed that the relationship was significant at p < .001.

      Weights

      In the 2015, 2017, and 2020 National Nursing Workforce Survey reports, nonresponse adjustments were made for gender and age. For the 2022 Survey, nonresponse adjustments were applied for gender and age in the jurisdictions for which data were obtained through the Nursys database. To create the combined age and gender (AgeGender) nonresponse weights (i.e., AgeGenderWgtC), the survey response rates for the age variable were compared at the 5-year age group level and neighboring cells with similar response rates were collapsed. Upon completion of this process, five age groups were created (18 to 34, 35 to 54, 55 to 59, ≥60, and missing). These five age groups were combined with the gender variable response categories (male, female, missing) to produce 15 AgeGender categories. The survey response rate for each AgeGender category (# responding/# in sample frame) was calculated and used to create each category’s weight as follows:
      AgeGender Category Weight=Overall Survey Response RateAgeGender Category Survey Response Rate


      As an example of how this was calculated, there were 1,794 RNs in the sample frame whose gender was identified as male and whose age was missing. Out of these 1,794 RNs, 196 responded. The AgeGender response rate for this category was determined to be 196/1794 = .1093. The overall survey response rate was 26757/129356 = 0.2068. So the AgeGender weight for the age missing-gender male category was 0.2068/0.1093 = 1.8934.
      When the AgeGender weights for each respondent are totaled, the sum comes to 26,757 – the same as the total number of respondents. Table B6 displays the weights for the 18 AgeGender categories in jurisdictions for which data were obtained through the Nursys database.
      Table B6Response Bias of Registered Nurses: AgeGender Weights
      Age Group, yGender: MissingGender: FemaleGender: Male
      18–341.6251.6232.428
      35–541.4301.4081.722
      55–591.0961.0331.181
      ≥600.7950.7940.909
      Age missing0.5981.2851.8934
      In a similar manner, poststratification weights (i.e., JurisdictionWgtC) were constructed at the state level to adjust for differing sampling rates across states. These adjustments were made by comparing the number of responses to the number of licensees in that state. Analysis of the raw data, without accounting for the sample design, would lead to the overall results being too heavily influenced by states with fewer licensees.
      For example, there were 466,414 RNs in California out of which 664 responded. The California response per license rate was 664/466414 = 0.0014. The overall response per license rate was 278631/5239499 = 0.0532. So, the poststratification weight for California was 0.0532/0.0014 = 37.3545.
      Overall weights (pct_wgtC), which combined the AgeGender and poststratification weights, were created by multiplying the AgeGender and poststratification weights for each individual to create an initial set of weights, adding the initial weights together and slightly adjusting the weights so that they summed to 278,631—the total number of responses in the mailout, email, and e-Notify portions of the survey.
      The overall weights adjust the distribution across states, age, and gender but sum to the actual number of RNs in the subset of completed responses. They can be applied when analyzing relationships between variables without the effect of artificially altering the degrees of freedom and thereby affecting significance tests.

      Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurse Nonresponse Analyses and Sample Weighting

      As with the RNs, a formal nonresponse bias analysis was conducted on the licensed practical nurse/licensed vocational nurse (LPNs/LVNs) data following the close of the survey. Variables in the data file came from both the Nursys database (i.e., the frame data) and responses to the survey (i.e., survey data). The variables used in the nonresponse analysis were from the frame and included date of birth and gender. The dependent variable in the analysis was whether or not the sampled LPN/LVN population completed the questionnaire. The analysis was restricted to the states in the mailout portion of the survey who allowed the data to be shared from the Nursys database.

      Preliminary analysis

      Of the 149,169 LPN/VNs in the sample frame, 22,634 responded for a response rate of 15.2% (Table B7). Table B8 shows the frequencies for gender, and Table B9 shows the descriptive statistics for age.
      Table B7Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: Response Rate (N = 149,169)
      Responsen%
      No126,53584.8
      Yes22,63415.2
      Table B8Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: Gender (N = 149,169)
      StatusGendern%Valid %
      ValidFemale83,33855.991.8
      Male7,5265.08.2
      Total90,86460.9100.0
      MissingRestricted/unknown15,76810.6%
      Missing42,53728.5%
      Total58,30539.1%
      Table B9Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: Descriptive Statistics for Age
      nMSDMinMax
      Age, y88,53047.113.418100

      Bivariate analysis

      Tables B10 shows the bivariate relationship between gender from the sample frame and whether or not the respondent completed the survey. There were far fewer men in the database (7,526 men compared to 83,338 women), and they were less likely to complete the survey (10.0% among men compared to 14.7% among women).
      Table B10Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: Survey Completion Rate by Gender
      GendernComplete Survey?
      No, %Yes, %
      Female83,33885.314.7
      Male7,52690.010.0
      Total90,86476.024.0
      Note. χ2 (1, N = 90,864) = 123.4, p < .001.
      Table B11 displays the mean age of LPN/VNs. On average, those who completed the survey were 6 years older than nonrespondents. This relationship was statistically significant.
      Table B11Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: Differences in Mean Age by Survey Completion
      Complete survey?nAge, y, M (SD)
      No75,84246.2 (13.2)
      Yes12,68852.2 (13.7)
      Total88,53047.1 (13.4)
      Note. A t test showed that this relationship was significant at p < .001.

      Weights

      In the 2015, 2017, and 2020 National Nursing Workforce Survey reports, nonresponse adjustments were made for gender and age. For the 2022 Survey, nonresponse adjustments were applied for gender and age in the jurisdictions for which data was obtained through the Nursys database. To create the combined age and gender (AgeGender) nonresponse weights (i.e., AgeGenderWgtC), the survey response rates for the age variable were compared at the 5-year age group level and neighboring cells with similar response rates were collapsed. Upon completion of this process, five age groups were created (18 to 34, 35 to 54, 55 to 59, ≥60, and missing). These five age groups were combined with the gender variable response categories (male, female, missing) to produce 15 AgeGender categories. The survey response rate for each AgeGender category (# responding/# in sample frame) was calculated and used to create each category’s weight as follows:
      AgeGender Category Weight=Overall Survey Response RateAgeGender Category Survey Response Rate


      An example of how this was calculated can be found in the RN nonresponse sample weighting section.
      When the AgeGender weights for each respondent are totaled, the sum equals 22,634 – the same as the total number of respondents. Table B12 displays the weights for the 15 AgeGender categories in jurisdictions for which data were obtained through the Nursys database.
      Table B12Response Bias of Licensed Practical Nurses/Licensed Vocational Nurses: AgeGender Weights
      Age Group, yGender: MissingGender: FemaleGender: Male
      18–342.3241.7842.706
      35–541.5971.4081.890
      55–591.0520.9081.296
      ≥600.7800.6770.984
      Age missing0.6111.2531.848
      In a similar manner, poststratification weights (i.e., JurisdictionWgtC) were constructed at the state level to adjust for differing sampling rates across states. However, these adjustments were made not by comparing the number of responses in a state to its sample frame count, but rather by comparing the number of responses to the number of licensees in that state. An example of how these weights were calculated can be found in the RN nonresponse sample weighting section.
      Overall weights (pct_wgtC), which combined the AgeGender and poststratification weights, were created by multiplying the AgeGender and poststratification weights for each individual to create an initial set of weights, adding the initial weights together, and slightly adjusting the weights so that they sum up to 55,503– the total number of responses in the mailout, email, and e-Notify portions of the survey.
      The overall weights adjust the distribution across states, age, and gender but sum to the actual number of LPNs/LVNs in the subset of completed responses. They can be applied when analyzing relationships between variables without the effect of artificially altering the degrees of freedom and thereby affecting significance tests.

      References

        • Institute of Medicine
        Future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health.
        • McMenamin P.
        Tsunami warning: Massive RN retirements coming.
        in: Medscape Nurses. 2014, April 9
        • National Academy of Medicine
        The future of nursing 2020-2030: Charting a path to achieve health equities.
        The National Academies Press. 2021;
        • Census Bureau U.S.
        ACS demographic and housing estimates. 2020; (Retrieved March 8, 2023, from): 2019
        • Yang Y.T.
        • Mason D.J.
        COVID-19’s impact on nursing shortages, the rise of travel nurses, and price gouging.
        Health Affairs Forefront. 2022, January 28; (Retrieved from)