Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Abrahaem v. General Medical Council (2004), England and Wales High Court, case 279 (Admin).
- The handling of complaints by the GMC.A study of decision-making and outcomes, Policy Studies Institute2000
Azzam v. General Medical Council (2008), England and Wales High Court, case 2711 (Admin).
- Developing standards, criteria, and thresholds to assess fitness to practise.BMJ. 2006; 332: 230-232https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7535.230
- Engagement, not personal characteristics, was associated with the seriousness of regulatory adjudication decisions about physicians: A cross-sectional study.BMC Medicine. 2019; 17 (Article 211)https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1451-1
- The good, the bad and the dishonest doctor: The General Medical Council and the ‘redemption model’ of fitness to practise.Legal Studies. 2011; 31: 591-614https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00203.x
Cohen v. General Medical Council (2008), England and Wales High Court, case 581 (Admin).
Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence v. Nursing and Midwifery Council & Grant (2011), England and Wales High Court, case 927 (Admin).
- GMC changes guidance on fitness to practise after High Court ruling.BMJ. 2008; 337 (Article a2887)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2887
- Practice makes perfect: Refining the rules that judge safe medicine.British Medical Journal. 2009; 339 (Article b3113)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b3113
- Factors associated with severity of sanctions among pharmacy professionals facing disciplinary proceedings.Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. 2021; 17: 638-641https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.023
- A retrospective analysis of the GDC’s performance against its newly-approved fitness to practise guidance.British Dental Journal. 2015; 219 (Article E5)https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.674
- One eye on the future, one eye on the past: The UK General Optical Council’s approach to fitness to practise.International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 2017; 30: 693-702
- Impairment and sanction in Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service fitness to practise proceedings.Medico-Legal Journal. 2015; 83: 15-21https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817214528205
- Eram, ergo sum? A 1-year retrospective study of General Pharmaceutical Council fitness to practise hearings.International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 2015; 23: 205-211https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpp.12151
- Disciplinary action against UK health professionals for sexual misconduct: A matter of reputational damage or public safety?.Journal of Medical Regulation. 2022; 107: 7-16https://doi.org/10.30770/2572-1852-107.4.7
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2015). The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. https://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2017). Sanctions Guidance. https://www.nmc.org.uk/ftp-library/sanctions/decision-making-factors/
- NMC guidance on publication of fitness to practise and registration appeal outcomes.(Nursing and Midwifery Council)https://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/ftp_information/publication-gudiance.pdfDate: 2018
Nursing and Midwifery Council. (2021). Understanding fitness to practise. https://www.nmc.org.uk/ftp-library/understanding-fitness-to-practise/
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004. (2004, No. 1761). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/1761/made
The Nursing and Midwifery Council (Midwifery & Practice Committees) (Constitution) Rules Order of Council 2008 (2008, No. 3148). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/3148/contents/made
The Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 (2002, No. 253). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2002/253/note
Zygmunt v. General Medical Council (2008), England and Wales High Court, case 2643 (Admin).
Conflicts of interest: None.