Continuing Education| Volume 10, ISSUE 2, P11-20, July 2019

Download started.


A Framework for Remediating Professional Ethical Lapses

      Nursing regulators, educators, practicing nurses, and the people they serve expect ethical standards of practice to be met in nursing and other healthcare professions. The reported incidence of professional discipline among nurses is low; however, some nurses (and other professionals) fail to demonstrate professional virtues and lose sight of professional ethical principles and duties. This article presents the types of issues that ultimately come to board attention, discusses the elements that may contribute to the issues, and describes an approach to help remediate professionals by equipping them with a framework to examine their reasoning and understand how and why they failed to uphold professional conduct. To help exemplify this approach, a case study on sexual boundary impingement and recommendations for regulatory boards are also presented.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Nursing Regulation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Caldicott C.V.
        • d’Oronzio J.C.
        Ethics remediation, rehabilitation, and recommitment to medical professionalism: A programmatic approach.
        Ethics & Behavior. 2015; 25: 279-296
        • Dilling T.A.
        • Miller M.
        When employment and licensure intersect: Addressing ex-offenders in the health care professions.
        Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2012; 3: 43-46
        • DuBois J.M.
        • Walsh H.A.
        • Chibnall J.T.
        • Anderson E.E.
        • Eggers M.R.
        • Fowose M.
        • Ziobrowski H.
        Sexual violation of patients by physicians: A mixed-methods, exploratory analysis of 101 cases.
        Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 2017;
        • Gabbard G.O.
        Psychodynamic approaches to physician sexual misconduct.
        in: Bloom J.D. Nadelson C.C. Notman M.T. Physician sexual misconduct. American Psychiatric Press, Washington, DC1999: 205-224
        • Holder K.V.
        • Schenthal S.J.
        Watch your step: Nursing and professional boundaries.
        Nursing Management. 2007: 24-30 (February 2007)
        • Irons R.
        • Schneider J.
        The wounded healer: Addiction-sensitive therapy for the sexually exploitative professional.
        Jason Aronson Inc, Northvale, NJ1999
        • Kenward K.
        An analysis of NURSYS® disciplinary data from 1996-2006.
        NCSBN Research Brief. 2009; 39: 1-29
      1. National Council of State Boards of Nursing. (n.d.). Alternative to discipline programs for substance use disorder. Retrieved from

        • Rutledge D.N.
        • Retrosi T.
        • Ostrowski G.
        Barriers to medication error reporting among hospital nurses.
        Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2018; 27: 1941-1949
        • Stacy S.
        Update: Federation of State Medical Boards policy on sexual misconduct, Presented at Sexual Boundary Violations: A National Meeting for Regularly Board Members, Atlanta, GA2005, July
        • Stacy S.
        Sexual misconduct: Where we have been, where we are, and where we are going, Presented at Sexual Boundary Violations: A National Course for Regulatory Boards, Dallas, TX2006, January


      Catherine V. Caldicott, MD, FACP, is Senior Faculty, Regulatory Liaison, & Consultant for Special Projects, at PBI Education, Jacksonville, Florida.

      Linked Article

      • Conflict of Interest Compliance Article 3
        Journal of Nursing Regulation Vol. 12Issue 2
        • Preview
          As is standard in scholarly publishing, NCSBN’s Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR) requires its authors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest (COI). Although COI information has always been collected by our staff in order to support editors’ review of the paper, it was not our standard practice to publish COI statements in each article. In this issue, JNR is retrospectively publishing the COI statements, which were collected with the below papers at submission, in order to make potential COI’s transparent to readers, as well as editors.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF